Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-22 Thread Sam Hartman
so, i'll be uploading to oldstable-security shortly. i have tested those patches. i have a package ready to build at the wheezy branch of the debian krb5 git (debcheckout krb5) I have not built that. I apparently don't have a wheezy environment and am not going to have chance to set up chroot

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-21 Thread Sam Hartman
I'll try to get it done by tomorrow morning east coast time. If it doesn't happen by then it will be a while and it would be great if someone else would step forward. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Tom Yu: Some limited testing indicates that when the packet storm is confined to a single host, legitimate kpasswd and kadm5 requests can still get through, and the CPU usage pegs at about 70%. I haven't tested with multiple hosts involved. Out of curiosity, how many spoofed packets have

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-20 Thread Tom Yu
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes: * Tom Yu: Some limited testing indicates that when the packet storm is confined to a single host, legitimate kpasswd and kadm5 requests can still get through, and the CPU usage pegs at about 70%. I haven't tested with multiple hosts involved. Out

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Tom Yu: Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes: * Tom Yu: Some limited testing indicates that when the packet storm is confined to a single host, legitimate kpasswd and kadm5 requests can still get through, and the CPU usage pegs at about 70%. I haven't tested with multiple hosts

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Sam Hartman: I assume this goes back to squeeze as well. Shouldn't the severity be higher? This seems probably worth a DSA because such ping-pong attacks can really be bad for a network/server. Or am I missing mittigations? Yes, packet loops can be annoying. I think we should issue a DSA

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-20 Thread Sam Hartman
Florian == Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes: Florian Yes, packet loops can be annoying. I think we should issue Florian a DSA for this. OK, do you want me to prepare patches and builds for squeeze and wheezy? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Sam Hartman: Florian == Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes: Florian Yes, packet loops can be annoying. I think we should issue Florian a DSA for this. OK, do you want me to prepare patches and builds for squeeze and wheezy? Yes, that would be ideal. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-14 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Package: krb5-admin-server Version: 1.10.1+dfsg-5 Owner: ka...@mit.edu Upstream has fixed CVE-2002-2443 in their git master, with the following commit message: Fix kpasswd UDP ping-pong [CVE-2002-2443] The kpasswd service provided by kadmind was vulnerable to a UDP ping-pong

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-14 Thread Sam Hartman
I assume this goes back to squeeze as well. Shouldn't the severity be higher? This seems probably worth a DSA because such ping-pong attacks can really be bad for a network/server. Or am I missing mittigations? I'd be happy to work on packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-14 Thread Tom Yu
Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org writes: I assume this goes back to squeeze as well. The bug is as old as the file it's in. Shouldn't the severity be higher? This seems probably worth a DSA because such ping-pong attacks can really be bad for a network/server. Or am I missing mittigations?

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-14 Thread Sam Hartman
severity 708267 serious tags 708267 security found 708267 krb5-admin-server/1.8.3+dfsg-4 thanks Yeah, sounds like an advisory to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-14 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
I have a patch staged in my local checkout of the packaging, but need to settle out some (apparent) multiarch issues on my jessie machine before I can install the resulting binaries for testing. -Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-14 Thread Sam Hartman
Benjamin == Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu writes: Benjamin I have a patch staged in my local checkout of the Benjamin packaging, but need to settle out some (apparent) Benjamin multiarch issues on my jessie machine before I can install Benjamin the resulting binaries for testing.

Bug#708267: cve-2002-2443: kpasswd udp ping-pong

2013-05-14 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, 14 May 2013, Sam Hartman wrote: Sorry, I missed this. and had already done an upload. No worries, it is a trivial patch to apply. Please push the packaging to alioth at your convenience. -Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of