Bug#709058: Metapackages targeting at testing pool or not (Was: Bug#709058: blends-dev: UNRELEASED and unstable sources.list differ)

2013-05-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Felipe, On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:58:12PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Your argument taht war are using "only" recommends is wrong because also > > recommends need to be fullfilled inside the release. Only suggested > > packages do not need to exist. So I insist that s.l.unstable needs t

Bug#709058: Metapackages targeting at testing pool or not (Was: Bug#709058: blends-dev: UNRELEASED and unstable sources.list differ)

2013-05-28 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > [I'm taking this bug report to the mailing list because I would like to > see a wider opinion.] > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:30:58PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:20:57AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >

Bug#709058: Metapackages targeting at testing pool or not (Was: Bug#709058: blends-dev: UNRELEASED and unstable sources.list differ)

2013-05-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, [I'm taking this bug report to the mailing list because I would like to see a wider opinion.] On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:30:58PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:20:57AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> > >> sources.list.unstable points to testing, but s.l.UNRELEAS