On 07/06/13 16:13, Petr Salinger wrote:
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 3.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC is not widespread fcntl, see also changes
On 11/06/13 11:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 07/06/13 16:13, Petr Salinger wrote:
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 3.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
The
On 11/06/13 11:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 11/06/13 11:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 07/06/13 16:13, Petr Salinger wrote:
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 3.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
the current version
The patch seems fine but given that F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC has been implemented in
FreeBSD[1], I wonder if the __linux__ test shouldn't be changed to a
HAVE_F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC check (or to a hurd one). How long do you think it'll take
for Debian's freebsd kernel to have that?
The version in stable does
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 3.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC is not widespread fcntl, see also changes between
5 matches
Mail list logo