Bug#712451: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#712451: Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2020-10-05 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On Fri, 02 Oct 2020, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Greetings, > > As AppArmor v3.0 is now released[1], is there a chance that network, dbus and > sockets will be supported in Bullseye? > > [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/2020-October/012183.html AppArmor 3 allows use of networkv8

Bug#712451: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2020-10-01 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Greetings, As AppArmor v3.0 is now released[1], is there a chance that network, dbus and sockets will be supported in Bullseye? [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/2020-October/012183.html -- Regards, A

Bug#712451: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2020-04-08 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Heenec (2020-04-09): > intrigeri: >> FWIW, this is now mentioned in the manpage that documents the policy >> language: apparmor.d(5) > > Maybe I have not read the manual thoroughly enough, but I have not found > mentions of features that does not work in Debian yet. On my sid system I see

Bug#712451: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2020-04-08 Thread Heenec
intrigeri: > FWIW, this is now mentioned in the manpage that documents the policy > language: apparmor.d(5) Maybe I have not read the manual thoroughly enough, but I have not found mentions of features that does not work in Debian yet. Maybe such notice should be placed in "Network Rules" section

Bug#712451: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2019-03-30 Thread intrigeri
Paolo Greppi: > Should this be documented in /usr/share/doc/apparmor/README.Debian ? FWIW, this is now mentioned in the manpage that documents the policy language: apparmor.d(5) Cheers, -- intrigeri

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2019-03-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
I looked at the status of this on buster: uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 4.19.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.16-1 (2019-01-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux and the issue still can be reproduced (in the sense that telnet.netkit network access will not be blocked after enforcing the rule). Except it

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-07-24 Thread Vincas Dargis
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:38:49 +0800 intrigeri wrote: John answered my question on IRC: - "you can't yet. You will need an apparmor 3.0 beta which keeps getting delayed" Aawww.. Anyway, good to know :) .

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-07-24 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri: > John, could you please tell me how I can benefit from the network > socket mediation feature that was merged into Linux 4.17? John answered my question on IRC: - "you can't yet. You will need an apparmor 3.0 beta which keeps getting delayed" - "for various reasons, I won't let the

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-07-24 Thread intrigeri
Hi, (John, one question for you below, please search for your name :) Vincas Dargis: > On 7/22/18 3:48 PM, intrigeri wrote: >> Vincas Dargis: >>> I've managed to install 4.17.0-rc3 and 4.18.0-rc4 with equivs hack, and I >>> did not see >>> any immediate problems with some lightweight testing.

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-07-23 Thread Vincas Dargis
On 7/22/18 3:48 PM, intrigeri wrote: Hi Vincas, Vincas Dargis: I've managed to install 4.17.0-rc3 and 4.18.0-rc4 with equivs hack, and I did not see any immediate problems with some lightweight testing. Great. Both on Stretch, right? Yes. Did you disable feature-set pinning entirely

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-07-22 Thread intrigeri
Hi Vincas, Vincas Dargis: > I've managed to install 4.17.0-rc3 and 4.18.0-rc4 with equivs hack, and I did > not see > any immediate problems with some lightweight testing. Great. Both on Stretch, right? Did you disable feature-set pinning entirely or update the feature-set to enable the new

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-07-15 Thread Vincas Dargis
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018 16:36:39 +0200 intrigeri wrote: Vincas Dargis: > linux-compiler-gcc-7-x86 needs gcc-7 that is not available? For Tails we work this around with equivs: https://git-tails.immerda.ch/tails/tree/config/chroot_local-hooks/12-kernel-modules-build-environment I've managed to

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-06-17 Thread intrigeri
Vincas Dargis: > linux-compiler-gcc-7-x86 needs gcc-7 that is not available? For Tails we work this around with equivs: https://git-tails.immerda.ch/tails/tree/config/chroot_local-hooks/12-kernel-modules-build-environment

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-06-17 Thread Vincas Dargis
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:44:58 +0200 intrigeri wrote: Also, it would be nice to test Linux 4.17 with the feature-sets we ship in Stretch and testing/sid, in order to catch any bug like #883703 ASAP. Got ideas how could I install 4.17 on Stretch? ``` $ sudo apt install -t experimental

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-06-17 Thread intrigeri
Vincas Dargis: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:44:58 +0200 intrigeri wrote: >> I'll be very busy until DebCamp so it's unlikely I do much on this >> front until then (best case I'll press the right buttons to enable >> this on my own system once 4.17 is in sid, but I won't have time to >> test software

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-06-17 Thread Vincas Dargis
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:44:58 +0200 intrigeri wrote: I'll be very busy until DebCamp so it's unlikely I do much on this front until then (best case I'll press the right buttons to enable this on my own system once 4.17 is in sid, but I won't have time to test software I don't use myself).

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-06-13 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri: > Linux v4.17-rc1 now supports basic socket mediation, which will allow > us to close this bug report: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=56974a6fcfef69ee0825bd66ed13e92070ac5224 … which made it into v4.17 final :) We could start testing

Bug#712451: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-04-20 Thread Vincas Dargis
Woohoo! What's next left, DBus? On 4/20/18 11:45 AM, intrigeri wrote: Linux v4.17-rc1 now supports basic socket mediation, which will allow us to close this bug report: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=56974a6fcfef69ee0825bd66ed13e92070ac5224 :)

Bug#712451: Please support AppArmor network rules

2018-04-20 Thread intrigeri
Linux v4.17-rc1 now supports basic socket mediation, which will allow us to close this bug report: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=56974a6fcfef69ee0825bd66ed13e92070ac5224 :)