On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Dan S wrote:
> 2013/6/23 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Dan S wrote:
>>> Hi -
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report. The "testsuite" does not need to be built for
>>> packaging, so actually we disable it in the most recent version in
>>> debian-git a
2013/6/23 Felipe Sateler :
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Dan S wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> Thanks for the report. The "testsuite" does not need to be built for
>> packaging, so actually we disable it in the most recent version in
>> debian-git and in experimental (which is supercollider 3.6.3). We c
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Dan S wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Thanks for the report. The "testsuite" does not need to be built for
> packaging, so actually we disable it in the most recent version in
> debian-git and in experimental (which is supercollider 3.6.3). We can
> do this for 3.5.3 as well, wh
Hi -
Thanks for the report. The "testsuite" does not need to be built for
packaging, so actually we disable it in the most recent version in
debian-git and in experimental (which is supercollider 3.6.3). We can
do this for 3.5.3 as well, which will fix this issue.*
However, I'm not sure what the
Source: supercollider
Version: 1:3.5.3~repack-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Ent
5 matches
Mail list logo