On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
On 2013-07-10 20:52:15 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
But this can be preferable if the removed package has security bugs
and has been removed for
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.9
Severity: normal
When a package is removed from Debian, it breaks the upgrade system.
For instance:
# apt-get install clang
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
clang : Depends: clang-3.2 (= 3.2-1~) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
# apt-get install clang
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
clang : Depends: clang-3.2 (= 3.2-1~) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
This is
On 2013-07-10 15:43:33 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
clang is no longer in unstable (the package – and its not the
reason, but I wouldn't expect it to work based on that)
clang is still in unstable:
$ apt-show-versions -a clang
clang:amd64 1:3.0-6.2 install ok installed
clang:amd64
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Beside: Detecting this would be pretty hard and full of cornercases
(especially as yours is already one as it crosses source-package
boundaries):
It wouldn't be that great if a package is removed from testing and the
On 2013-07-10 20:52:15 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
But this can be preferable if the removed package has security bugs
and has been removed for this reason (the user wouldn't be aware of
that with the current behavior of
6 matches
Mail list logo
