On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:29:04 Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
The patch to fix FTBFS against GnuTLS 2.6 is trivial, and is attached
with this email.
Please consider reverting and making libucommon build and link against
GnuTLS 2.6.
Jonas,
Given the above and your LowNMU, if you are happy I intend
Quoting Mark Purcell (2014-01-21 09:23:25)
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:29:04 Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
The patch to fix FTBFS against GnuTLS 2.6 is trivial, and is
attached with this email.
Please consider reverting and making libucommon build and link
against GnuTLS 2.6.
Given the above
Control: tag patch
I think the problem here is not about making sflphone unbuildable, but
unfortunate licensing of libgnutls28.
It has moved from LGPL2.1 to LGPL3, and thus became incompatible with
any other GPLv2 code. Since ucomomn has so many reverse-dependencies,
this essentially forces many
Quoting peter green (2013-08-18 01:32:05)
Recent libucommon fails to build with libgnutls.
When I tried it I got a failure on a conversion from an integer to an
enum, C allows this while C++ does not according to the standard.
However there is a command line option -fpermissive which makes
Recent libucommon fails to build with libgnutls.
When I tried it I got a failure on a conversion from an integer to an
enum, C allows this while C++ does not according to the standard.
However there is a command line option -fpermissive which makes g++
allow this. Putting -fpermissive in
Quoting Jeremy Bicha (2013-08-02 18:16:59)
This issue, while valid, isn't serious.
I disagree. It's impossible to build sflphone in Debian unstable which
means it's impossible to fix bugs (security or otherwise) in that
package. That makes ucommon in its current form unsuitable for
severity -1 important
thanks
Quoting Jeremy Bicha (2013-07-13 18:43:33)
Package: libucommon-dev
Version: 6.0.6-1
Severity: serious
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu saucy
libucommon-dev depends on libgnutls28-dev but libgnutls28-dev is not
co-installable with
On 13 July 2013 20:08, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
And I believe that means you either need to figure out how to get
ucommon to build with gnutls26 either by patching it or reverting back
to a version that does build with gnutls26.
One other possibility is to introduce a new source
This issue, while valid, isn't serious.
I disagree. It's impossible to build sflphone in Debian unstable which
means it's impossible to fix bugs (security or otherwise) in that
package. That makes ucommon in its current form unsuitable for
release. Because of the soname transition that can't be
Quoting Jeremy Bicha (2013-07-14 02:08:17)
On 13 July 2013 18:57, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Recent libucommon fails to build with libgnutls.
Can sflphone be built with libgnutls28?
Uh, I think you mean can gnome-vfs (libgnomeui-dev depends on
libgnomefvs2-dev which depends
Package: libucommon-dev
Version: 6.0.6-1
Severity: serious
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu saucy
libucommon-dev depends on libgnutls28-dev but libgnutls28-dev is not
co-installable with libgnutls-dev.
sflphone also build-depends on libgnomeui-dev which depends on
Quoting Jeremy Bicha (2013-07-13 18:43:33)
libucommon-dev depends on libgnutls28-dev but libgnutls28-dev is not
co-installable with libgnutls-dev.
sflphone also build-depends on libgnomeui-dev which depends on
libgnutls-dev.
Recent libucommon fails to build with libgnutls.
Can sflphone
On 13 July 2013 18:57, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Recent libucommon fails to build with libgnutls.
Can sflphone be built with libgnutls28?
Uh, I think you mean can gnome-vfs (libgnomeui-dev depends on
libgnomefvs2-dev which depends on libgnutls-dev) be built against
libgnutls28?
13 matches
Mail list logo
