Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2019-01-15 Thread Hilmar Preuße
reassign 717636 texlive-lang-other found 717636 2018.20181214-1 stop On 13.10.14 13:34, intrigeri wrote: > On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: > > $ t1disasm > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep > start > dup 3 {systemdict /internaldict

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-11-11 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (13 Oct 2014 11:51:51 GMT) : On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: $ t1disasm /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep start dup 3 {systemdict

Bug#717636: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hi, Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: $ t1disasm /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep start dup 3 {systemdict

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-13 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (02 Oct 2014 13:41:01 GMT) : intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes: Isn't it a transitional package depending on the one that now ships the font? Isn't the font still affected by the problem this bug is about? Nope! The source of that package is pre XeLaTeX and no

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-13 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: $ t1disasm /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep start dup 3 {systemdict /internaldict known not {pop 3} {1183615869 systemdict

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (02 Oct 2014 05:23:48 GMT) : Well probably bug should be closed, because the new package is just transitional package and doesn't have any source in it which was the reason for this bug report. Isn't it a transitional package depending on the one that now ships the

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-02 Thread Vasudev Kamath
intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes: Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (02 Oct 2014 05:23:48 GMT) : Well probably bug should be closed, because the new package is just transitional package and doesn't have any source in it which was the reason for this bug report. Isn't it a transitional package

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-10-01 Thread Vasudev Kamath
intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes: Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (14 Aug 2014 08:12:31 GMT) : Its no longer part of Debian-IN team, now its transitional package part of TexLive, thanks to Debian-Tex maintainers (Norbert specifically) [1] OK, fair enough. The RC bug (#717636) should probably

Bug#717636: latex-sanskrit package

2014-09-30 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Vasudev Kamath wrote (14 Aug 2014 08:12:31 GMT) : Its no longer part of Debian-IN team, now its transitional package part of TexLive, thanks to Debian-Tex maintainers (Norbert specifically) [1] OK, fair enough. The RC bug (#717636) should probably be reassigned to the package that ships

Bug#717636: [latex-sanskrit] Package contain type1 startlock fragment from black book

2013-07-23 Thread Bastien ROUCARIÈS
Package: latex-sanskrit Version: 2.2-10 Severity: serious control: block -1 by 694308 Hi, You have overriden the lintian warning about the copyrighted fragment of adobe. After a double check they are some problem still t1disasm sktb10.pfb | grep start give some positive check from black