On July 29, 2015 08:41:16 PM Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Well, did anyone here tell the submitter to report it upstream? I don't
> see anything. Did anyone from boost maintainers did so? I don't think
> so. Therefore, I wouldn't expect upstream fixes.
In fact, the original poster did submit a bug upstr
Hallo,
* Dimitri John Ledkov [Sat, Jul 25 2015, 02:40:26PM]:
> On 24 July 2015 at 21:08, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:52:39 + Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >> Source: boost1.54
> >> Version: 1.54.0-2
> >> Severity: important
> >> Justification: fails to build from source (but bui
On 24 July 2015 at 21:08, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:52:39 + Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Source: boost1.54
>> Version: 1.54.0-2
>> Severity: important
>> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
>> past)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Iâ ve not yet had time
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:52:39 + Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Source: boost1.54
> Version: 1.54.0-2
> Severity: important
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Hi,
>
> Iâve not yet had time to look at this, but my guess is
> that bjam assumes natura
tag 719484 + patch
thanks
This is the aforementioned patch:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/8993/boost_1_54_0-m68k-1.patch
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mikael Pettersson
Message-ID: <21003.14853.20671.257...@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>
I've reported this to boost <
Source: boost1.54
Version: 1.54.0-2
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
I’ve not yet had time to look at this, but my guess is
that bjam assumes natural alignment / struct padding,
which is not portable – implicit alignment assump
6 matches
Mail list logo
