On 2013-11-17 23:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Niels Thykier (2013-11-17 22:15:24)
>> On 2013-10-27 08:17, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> I am bumping the severity of this bug, because we would like
>>> openjdk-6 to disappear "really soon"(tm).
>
>> Any news on this? OpenJDK-6 is definitely go
Quoting Niels Thykier (2013-11-17 22:15:24)
> On 2013-10-27 08:17, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > I am bumping the severity of this bug, because we would like
> > openjdk-6 to disappear "really soon"(tm).
> Any news on this? OpenJDK-6 is definitely going away; the question is
> just "when" and this b
On 2013-10-27 08:17, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: uwsgi
> Version: 1.9.17.1-5
> Followup-For: Bug #720571
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hi,
>
> I am bumping the severity of this bug, because we would like openjdk-6
> to disappear "really soon"(tm).
>
> ~Niels
>
Hey,
Any news on this?
Package: uwsgi
Version: 1.9.17.1-5
Followup-For: Bug #720571
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
I am bumping the severity of this bug, because we would like openjdk-6
to disappear "really soon"(tm).
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Package: uwsgi
Severity: important
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: openjdk-7-transition
Hello,
As part of the transition to OpenJDK 7 and the removal of OpenJDK 6 from
the archive, could you update the dependency of your package to
default-jdk ?
Thanks,
Sylvestre
-- System Infor
5 matches
Mail list logo