On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 23:11:15 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> Why BTS believes #712575 affects 1.5.3-3? Was this some automatic logic
> or was this due to my bad communication in my original transition bug
> report text.
>
Because none of the versions in the sid package's changelog were marked
Hi,
I am a bit confused. I see Laurent Bigonville made some workaround but
this BTS behavior is strange.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:31:15AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 23:37:51 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> >--> package newer upstream using new GObject introspecti
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 23:37:51 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>--> package newer upstream using new GObject introspection
> * ibus-anthy: already in exp by me.
>
Hi,
ibus-anthy is currently blocking the transition because of #712575,
which the BTS believes affects 1.5.3-3. Is that actually
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 07:40:33PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 23:42:25 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> > ibus-client-clutter
>
> FTBFS,
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ibus-client-clutter&suite=sid
I filed this as Bug#722713
Since upstream GIT URL
Hi,
2013/9/13 Julien Cristau :
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 23:42:25 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
>> ibus-client-clutter
>
> FTBFS,
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ibus-client-clutter&suite=sid
>
>> mozc
>>
> FTBFS, https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mozc&suite=sid
>
> Coul
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 23:42:25 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Please binNMU the following.
>
> ibus-client-clutter
> ibus-input-pad
> ibus-libthai
> ibus-pinyin
> ibus-rime
> ibus-skk
> ibus-sunpinyin
> ibus-unikey
> kdeplasma-addons
> mlterm
> mozc
>
Scheduled.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Des
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 23:42:25 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> ibus-client-clutter
FTBFS,
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ibus-client-clutter&suite=sid
> mozc
>
FTBFS, https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mozc&suite=sid
Could you please file bugs and/or fix these?
Thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 08:24:00PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > * Those arch:any packages depending on -dev and have no source updates.
> > I do not need to do anything but wait binnmu. Correct???
> >
> Please give us a list of these source packages.
Please binNMU the following.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 01:03:40 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Can I now upload packages which depends on ibus 1.5?
>
Yes.
> * Am I blocked to make source update upload on packages with "collisions"?
> ibus-pinyin ???
>
No.
> * Those arch:all packages depending on -dev
> ibus-table
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 01:03 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I thought the mail to debian-release ML:
> "bug 721844 is forwarded to
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ibus1.5.html";
> was the ack
No, that just means that a tracker has been set up. An ack would be
explicit and say "please go
Julien,
Excuse me. You mean I should have waited.
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:15:44PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks. I may have misunderstood the system.
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 23:37:51 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity:
Control: tags -1 pending
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 23:37:51 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Please allow us to make ibus transition 1.4 to 1.5 in terms of upstream
> API version.
Ap
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Please allow us to make ibus transition 1.4 to 1.5 in terms of upstream
API version.
Debian Upstream API
stable 1.4.1-9
13 matches
Mail list logo
