Hi,
Did you want to actually close or downgrade this bug now?
The dieharder package got autoremoved from jessie because
it's still outstanding with RC severity.
I asked -release about jessie-ignoring it like it was for
wheezy, and the initial answer from them is that they'd
prefer it if either
On 27 December 2014 at 04:18, Ron wrote:
|
| Hi,
|
| Did you want to actually close or downgrade this bug now?
No, because nobody ever replied (including upstream, with whom I've worked on
RDieHarder for years, but whose email response rate is still, err, a little
erratic).
| The dieharder
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:14:09PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 27 December 2014 at 04:18, Ron wrote:
|
| Hi,
|
| Did you want to actually close or downgrade this bug now?
No, because nobody ever replied (including upstream, with whom I've worked on
RDieHarder for years, but
I would like to close this. Objections?
I would suggest reducing the severity instead, perhaps with a rename.
Otherwise there is a risk of duplicates being raised, and the issue
repeating itself.
Regards,
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: dieharder
Severity: grave
Version: 3.31.1-3
X-Debbugs-cc: ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
As per the copyright file[1]:
License is granted to build or use the accompanying software:
dieharder
according to the following standard Gnu General Public License or
On 16 September 2013 at 17:24, Raphael Geissert wrote:
| Package: dieharder
| Severity: grave
Really?
CCing upstream who may find the his absence of a sense of humour rather
humouress.
Dirk
| Version: 3.31.1-3
| X-Debbugs-cc: ftpmas...@debian.org
|
| Hi,
|
| As per the copyright file[1]:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:24:58PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
according to the following standard Gnu General Public License or any
later versions, with the one minor Beverage modification listed below.
Note that this modification is probably not legally defensible and can
be
7 matches
Mail list logo
