-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/09/13 11:41, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Daniel Pocock 2013-09-25 <5242a851.1080...@pocock.com.au>
>> Apart from the procpid issue, are there likely to be many other
>> painful issues with migrating apps?
>
> standard_conforming_strings defa
Re: Daniel Pocock 2013-09-25 <5242a851.1080...@pocock.com.au>
> Apart from the procpid issue, are there likely to be many other painful
> issues with migrating apps?
standard_conforming_strings defaults to 'on' in 9.2+, just like the
pg_stat_activity was already changed in 9.2.
Given that 9.2 has
Daniel Pocock [2013-09-25 11:09 +0200]:
> Given that concurrent versions are supported on Debian, is there any
> hope of keeping 9.1 as an option for people who want to build Debian
> systems that are more in sync with commercial distributions?
Yes, you can install them from apt.postgresql.org, bu
On 24/09/13 08:38, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 24/09/13 07:54, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Daniel Pocock [2013-09-23 19:20 +0200]:
>>> I'm just wondering about the status of PostgreSQL 9.1 for jessie, will
>>> it still be included?
>> No, as usual we will only support one major version in each Debian
>>
On 24/09/13 07:54, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Daniel Pocock [2013-09-23 19:20 +0200]:
>> I'm just wondering about the status of PostgreSQL 9.1 for jessie, will
>> it still be included?
>
> No, as usual we will only support one major version in each Debian
> release, which will be 9.3. We will remove 9
Daniel Pocock [2013-09-23 19:20 +0200]:
> I'm just wondering about the status of PostgreSQL 9.1 for jessie, will
> it still be included?
No, as usual we will only support one major version in each Debian
release, which will be 9.3. We will remove 9.1 soon, and rebuild all
extensions against 9.3, a
6 matches
Mail list logo
