Control: tag -1 = patch
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 06:10:16PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
09.04.2016, 09:12, Ryan Tandy kirjoitti:
What happens if both copies of libldap somehow end up linked into the
same process? I don't know freeipa well enough to imagine a specific
scenario, but it probably
09.04.2016, 09:12, Ryan Tandy kirjoitti:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 08:41:01PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Are you planning to do this in unstable as well, or just in xenial (as
> it sounds like it might be a temporary measure)? Luca and I talked about
> binNEW a while back, and flagged the
08.04.2016, 20:41, Timo Aaltonen kirjoitti:
> 03.04.2016, 12:32, Timo Aaltonen kirjoitti:
>> 20.05.2015, 20:43, Ryan Tandy kirjoitti:
>>> Hi dkg,
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:58:08PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
If the work to switch openldap to NSS is strictly because of licensing
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2015, Ryan Tandy wrote:
My understanding was that motivation for the request was wanting to
provide a fully-featured freeipa server in Debian, while some of its
features (specifically replication) only work properly when using
libldap built with nss.
actually, it's
Hi dkg,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:58:08PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/725153 suggests moving openldap's TLS backend in
debian from gnutls to nss.
The reasons given appear to be the older gnutls/gcrypt suid problem
(which is quite a serious concern, particularly
5 matches
Mail list logo
