Hi Ivan, is this still something you'd like to see changed?
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:30:30 +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
Being unfamiliar with rlwrap(1), I’ve implemented a crude but
seemingly useful work-alike in Perl. While I’m not planning to
release it anytime soon (now that I’ve learned
Mike Miller mtmil...@ieee.org writes:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 18:56:33 +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
The conventional namespace for application-specific Perl modules is
App::⟨package name⟩::⟨module name…⟩.
Can you give some examples or references?
Perhaps I was a bit mistaken on
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 18:56:33 +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
The conventional namespace for application-specific Perl modules
is App::⟨package name⟩::⟨module name…⟩.
Can you give some examples or references? I see a few but not enough
that I'd call it a convention. As opposed to
Package: rlwrap
Version: 0.37-3
Severity: wishlist
The conventional namespace for application-specific Perl modules
is App::⟨package name⟩::⟨module name…⟩. Moreover, the
conventional directory for Perl modules is /usr/share/perl5, and
indeed, – it’s already in
4 matches
Mail list logo
