On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> While effect of unaligned accesses is normally invisible,
No, the compiler is inserting padding here silently.
We call this “implicit padding”. The problem with it
is that this padding is architecture-dependent, and
some platforms have other alignment r
Hi,
On keskiviikko 16 heinäkuu 2014, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Absolutely. Could the upstream Mesa developers maybe apply the patch
> > as well?
>
> They are not taking us for real, see #728053 for their feedback…
While effect of unaligned
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Absolutely. Could the upstream Mesa developers maybe apply the patch
> as well?
They are not taking us for real, see #728053 for their feedback…
> We're putting lots of efforts into the m68k port and we have many
> users who love running De
Hi Thorsten!
On 07/16/2014 01:03 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> updated debdiff attached. Package compiles fine with it
> (on i386 and m68k), and the invalid alignment assumptions
> were made explicit with no ABI breakage.
Awesome! That's great to hear!
> Please apply.
Absolutely. Could the upstr
Hi all,
updated debdiff attached. Package compiles fine with it
(on i386 and m68k), and the invalid alignment assumptions
were made explicit with no ABI breakage.
Please apply.
Thanks,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜ Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)diff -u mesa-10.2.3/debian/changelog mesa-10
5 matches
Mail list logo
