Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-29 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Dimitri, On 29.07.2014 03:12, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: I don't have an opinion about ffmpeg vs libav, apart from how hard the soname transitions are, especially in ubuntu where we somehow ended up with ex-multimedia packages around that either never were in debian, or have been long

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-29 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: I don't have an opinion about ffmpeg vs libav, apart from how hard the soname transitions are, especially in ubuntu where we somehow ended up with ex-multimedia packages around that either never were

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:39:29 +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Hi Reinhard, On 28.07.2014 02:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: * Does it make sense for me to switch my package? The rule of thumb

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Alessio Treglia
Ciao, On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo fight it out among themselves and pick a winner. We're not going to ship both and hand that mess over to the security team. Personally I

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 28, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: Personally I don't feel like dropping libav in favor of ffmpeg now at this stage. It's too late for Jessie. Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed. Personally I feel

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Julien, On 28.07.2014 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote: It remains to be seen, what the release team prefers: frustrated users and developers or both forks in jessie. The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo fight it out among themselves and pick a winner. I am

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:12 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed. at least in theory. Plus I would definitely appreciate to see some bug stats

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 (resending, to keep debian-devel and the bug-report in the loop) personally i would welcome if both libav and ffmpeg could co-exist within Debian¹. as i see it, libav and ffmpeg have diverged, and as such i would like to have the choice which one

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote: In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in debian/testing. In consequence this means that any package that

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
On 28.07.2014 13:24, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:12 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed. at least in theory. Plus I would

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
On 28.07.2014 13:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote: In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:05:46PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: On 28.07.2014 13:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote: In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more than

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 28 July 2014 15:05, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: On 28.07.2014 13:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote: In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: * Does it make sense for me to switch my package? The rule of thumb is, if your upstream uses FFmpeg for development you probably want to switch to using it, too. In [1], Moritz from the security

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-27 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 28, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: Moreover, I am curious why I haven't seen you working on libavcodec bugs in Debian before, and why do you believe you can do a better job with the ffmpeg package currently on NEW? Why should he work on libavcodec when he (along with many

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-27 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi, On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote: In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in debian/testing. In consequence this means that any package that builds against the ffmpeg packages currently

Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-27 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Reinhard, On 28.07.2014 02:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: * Does it make sense for me to switch my package? The rule of thumb is, if your upstream uses FFmpeg for development you probably want

Bug#729203: FFmpeg Experimental Nightly in LaunchPad

2014-04-28 Thread Cyborg Ethly Alpha {My Research Desk}
Hi, I've begun the work on FFmpeg 2.x in Lauchpad; Project page; https://launchpad.net/ffmpeg-exp-nightly PPA; https://launchpad.net/~cyborg-alpha-nh4/+archive/ffmpeg-exp-nightly I tried to set-up in https://alioth.debian.org , but received the following error on verify; Exiting with error ---

Bug#729203: FFmpeg in Ubuntu

2014-04-24 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi, On 23.04.2014 23:08, Cyborg Ethly Alpha {My Research Desk} wrote: I'm in the middle of clearing up some network issues (on my network). It seems you're not the only one with network issues, as Thorsten Glaser seems to be temporarily unavailable: Delivery to the following recipient has

Bug#729203: ffmpeg packaging progress?

2014-02-11 Thread Timothy Gu
Hello, On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Antoine Beaupré anar...@debian.org wrote: Here it goes - I have been able to make a statically-built ffmpeg package that can be installed alongside libav harmlessly. It doesn't replace the libav libraries, so things like VLC and others still link

Bug#729203: ffmpeg alongside libav

2014-02-11 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2014-02-11 13:04:53, Timothy Gu wrote: I have experimented with the new --enable-rpath configure option of FFmpeg, and found that it is even possible to install shared libraries alongside Libav, without interrupting Libav headers, programs, or libraries. See my gist:

Bug#729203: ffmpeg alongside libav

2014-02-11 Thread Timothy Gu
On Feb 11, 2014 10:27 AM, Antoine Beaupré anar...@debian.org wrote: On 2014-02-11 13:04:53, Timothy Gu wrote: I have experimented with the new --enable-rpath configure option of FFmpeg, and found that it is even possible to install shared libraries alongside Libav, without interrupting

Bug#729203: ffmpeg alongside libav

2014-02-11 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2014-02-11 19:00:45, Timothy Gu wrote: On Feb 11, 2014 10:27 AM, Antoine Beaupré anar...@debian.org wrote: On 2014-02-11 13:04:53, Timothy Gu wrote: I have experimented with the new --enable-rpath configure option of FFmpeg, and found that it is even possible to install shared libraries

Bug#729203: ffmpeg alongside libav

2014-02-11 Thread Anssi Hannula
12.02.2014 02:09, Antoine Beaupré kirjoitti: On 2014-02-11 19:00:45, Timothy Gu wrote: On Feb 11, 2014 10:27 AM, Antoine Beaupré anar...@debian.org wrote: Besides, -rpath is actually a lintian warning: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath.html The page states that:

Bug#729203: ffmpeg alongside libav

2014-02-11 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2014-02-11 19:25:57, Anssi Hannula wrote: Well, statically linking all the four ff* executables of ffmpeg would quadruple the total size due to duplication, and the libraries already take over 10MB even without that... Point taken, patches / pull requests / git send-email welcome. :P Note

Bug#729203: ffmpeg alongside libav

2014-02-11 Thread Timothy Gu
On Feb 11, 2014 4:09 PM, Antoine Beaupré anarcat anar...@debian.org@anar...@debian.org debian.org anar...@debian.org wrote: On 2014-02-11 19:00:45, Timothy Gu wrote: On Feb 11, 2014 10:27 AM, Antoine Beaupré anarcatanar...@debian.org @ anar...@debian.orgdebian.org anar...@debian.org wrote:

Bug#729203: ffmpeg packaging progress?

2014-02-10 Thread Antoine Beaupré
Is there a git repository or a source for a ffmpeg package? I understand there's a controversy against its inclusion in the main archive, but right now I have stumbled upon a bug (#738599) which keeps me from reading videos with libav. I'd like to see if I can reproduce the problem with ffmpeg,

Bug#729203: ffmpeg packaging progress?

2014-02-10 Thread Antoine Beaupré
Here it goes - I have been able to make a statically-built ffmpeg package that can be installed alongside libav harmlessly. It doesn't replace the libav libraries, so things like VLC and others still link against libav. This package doesn't exhibit bug #738599. I pushed this on github for now:

Bug#729203: ffmpeg

2014-01-30 Thread Bodar Bbs
visit this for enable ffmpeg on your websitehttp://easyscript4u.blogspot.in/2013/06/how-to-enable-ffmpeg-in-php.html -- Thanks and Regards Bhavesh Bodar (BBS) +91 968 240 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#729203: FFMPEG and libav should be a choice

2014-01-09 Thread Patrick Shirkey
Hi, Linux Audio Developers often have to assist users with audio and multimedia issues that are working in ffmpeg but not in libav. In addition the deprecation message for the ffmpeg wrapper causes a lot of confusion and even though it is not meant maliciously most people perceive it as an attack

Bug#729203: ffmpeg for debian/ubuntu

2014-01-01 Thread Ed Rogalsky
Hi, please please provide ffmpeg in ubuntu because I had a lot of trouble with libav. I compile myself ffmpeg. eddrog