Control: block -1 with 734528 734668 735333
On 2014-01-27 16:41, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> not sure if I’m eligible; I got a (socially, not technical) restricted
> access to wanna-build to do the binNMUs required after upgrading Haskell
> package.
Since I couldn't find a reason that the release-t
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.01.2014, 16:18 +0100 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
> Control: block -1 with 735891 701302 719382
>
> Joachim, can you schedule binNMUs where neccessary?
not sure if I’m eligible; I got a (socially, not technical) restricted
access to wanna-build to do the binNMUs required afte
Control: block -1 with 735891 701302 719382
Joachim, can you schedule binNMUs where neccessary?
At least rss2irc and github-backup didn't get any so far.
$ dak rm -Rn -s testing -b libicu48
Will remove the following packages from testing:
libicu48 | 4.8.1.1-14 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfr
Julien Cristau wrote:
>> I'd like to upgrade the version of ICU from 4.8 to 52. They changed
>> their version numbering scheme essentially multiplying everything by 10.
>> We skipped a few versions (49, 50, 51) because of the freeze before
>> wheezy. This is the first major version to be releas
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 16:41:58 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> I'd like to upgrade the version of ICU from 4.8 to 52. They changed
> their version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I'd like to upgrade the version of ICU from 4.8 to 52. They changed
their version numbering scheme essentially multiplying everything by 10.
We skipped a few versions (49, 50, 51) becaus
6 matches
Mail list logo