Bug#729531: transition: icu

2014-01-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: block -1 with 734528 734668 735333 On 2014-01-27 16:41, Joachim Breitner wrote: > not sure if I’m eligible; I got a (socially, not technical) restricted > access to wanna-build to do the binNMUs required after upgrading Haskell > package. Since I couldn't find a reason that the release-t

Bug#729531: transition: icu

2014-01-27 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 27.01.2014, 16:18 +0100 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > Control: block -1 with 735891 701302 719382 > > Joachim, can you schedule binNMUs where neccessary? not sure if I’m eligible; I got a (socially, not technical) restricted access to wanna-build to do the binNMUs required afte

Bug#729531: transition: icu

2014-01-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: block -1 with 735891 701302 719382 Joachim, can you schedule binNMUs where neccessary? At least rss2irc and github-backup didn't get any so far. $ dak rm -Rn -s testing -b libicu48 Will remove the following packages from testing: libicu48 | 4.8.1.1-14 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfr

Bug#729531: transition: icu

2013-12-04 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Julien Cristau wrote: >> I'd like to upgrade the version of ICU from 4.8 to 52. They changed >> their version numbering scheme essentially multiplying everything by 10. >> We skipped a few versions (49, 50, 51) because of the freeze before >> wheezy. This is the first major version to be releas

Bug#729531: transition: icu

2013-12-01 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: tags -1 confirmed On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 16:41:58 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > I'd like to upgrade the version of ICU from 4.8 to 52. They changed > their version

Bug#729531: transition: icu

2013-11-13 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I'd like to upgrade the version of ICU from 4.8 to 52. They changed their version numbering scheme essentially multiplying everything by 10. We skipped a few versions (49, 50, 51) becaus