Bug#730572: reprepro: support for ddebs (debug symbols)

2019-06-11 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 at 08:53:16 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > In the actual implementation we got live now, there are a couple of > changes though. > > * The dbgsym packages use the .deb extension For the non-Debian projects for which I developed this patch, we still need at least basic support

Bug#730572: reprepro: support for ddebs (debug symbols)

2015-12-20 Thread Niels Thykier
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:45:37 + Simon McVittie wrote: > On 01/12/13 02:34, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > > * Simon McVittie [131126 18:03]: > >> The attached patch is a proof-of-concept implementation > > [...] > > Thanks! I've

Bug#730572: reprepro: support for ddebs (debug symbols)

2013-12-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On 01/12/13 02:34, Bernhard R. Link wrote: * Simon McVittie simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk [131126 18:03]: The attached patch is a proof-of-concept implementation -if (entry-type == fe_DEB || entry-type == fe_UDEB) +if (FE_BINARY(entry-type)) I've already applied

Bug#730572: reprepro: support for ddebs (debug symbols)

2013-11-30 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Simon McVittie simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk [131126 18:03]: (Deliberately not tagging this +patch right now, since Debian doesn't officially support ddebs yet, and the archive layout looks likely to change.) Ubuntu has a semi-separate archive for separate debug symbols, and

Bug#730572: reprepro: support for ddebs (debug symbols)

2013-11-26 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: reprepro Version: 4.13.1-1+b1 Severity: wishlist (Deliberately not tagging this +patch right now, since Debian doesn't officially support ddebs yet, and the archive layout looks likely to change.) Ubuntu has a semi-separate archive for separate debug symbols, and