Bug#730855: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#730855: Please support mips(el), mipsn32(el) and mips64(el)

Half a year ago I asked for more information, but never saw a reply. > Before enabling acpi-fakekey for mips* I'd like to see that it a) works on > mips* and b) that it serves a purpose. There are some scripts that call it, > but > I have no idea if there is any way to trigger these scripts. Doe

Bug#730855: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#730855: Please support mips(el), mipsn32(el) and mips64(el)

> But acpi-fakekey isn't, so this means acpi-support is not installable on any > architecture that isn't listed there. Before enabling acpi-fakekey for mips* I'd like to see that it a) works on mips* and b) that it serves a purpose. There are some scripts that call it, but I have no idea if ther

Bug#730855: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#730855: Please support mips(el), mipsn32(el) and mips64(el)

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Michael Meskes wrote: > clone 730855 -1 > assign -1 acpi-fakekey > thanks > >> But acpi-fakekey isn't, so this means acpi-support is not installable on any >> architecture that isn't listed there. > > So why did you not report it against acpi-fakekey then? > > Anyw

Bug#730855: Please support mips(el), mipsn32(el) and mips64(el)

Package: acpi-support Severity: wishlist Please add `mips mipsel mipsn32 mipsn32el mips64 mips64el' to Architecture stanza of deian/control I can confirm that it build successfully on mipsel/mips64el. acpi has already adopt the support for MIPS architectures (Bug #725918), so I think it's appropr