On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote:
Mostly because the package would not contain the
majority of the stand-alone thinkpad-specific tools and utils (such as tpb,
thinkbat, thinkfan, etc).
That is the problem, it is just screen rotation and docking. “-scripts”
sounds like some
I talked about this with another developer:
https://github.com/martin-ueding/think-rotate/issues/26
It looks like there is no `thinkpad-` package in Ubuntu or Debian, but
several with `think` in them. Does it really make sense to rename this
to `thinkpad`, when there are other packages like
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote:
https://github.com/martin-ueding/think-rotate/issues/26
It looks like there is no `thinkpad-` package in Ubuntu or Debian, but
several with `think` in them. Does it really make sense to rename this
to `thinkpad`, when there are other packages like
Okay, “thinklight” does not count, then.
The question is, whether using “thinkpad-” would cause any trouble with
trademarks?
I think “thinkpad-utils” or “thinkpad-tools” or “thinkpad-scripts” is an
improvement. Would those be okay with you?
The problem is that it started as a single rotation
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote:
Okay, “thinklight” does not count, then.
The question is, whether using “thinkpad-” would cause any trouble with
trademarks?
We'd need to ask a lawyer to get an useful answer to that question, I think.
I think “thinkpad-utils” or “thinkpad-tools”
We'd need to ask a lawyer to get an useful answer to that question, I think.
The problem is that I do not know a lawyer that I could just ask. And I
am German, another dev is American, so I have no idea whether to ask a
German or an American lawyer.
We already have the name in the description.
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote:
* Package name: think-rotate
Could you be persuaded to name this thinkpad-rotate ?
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie.
`thinkpad-rotate` makes more sense, indeed. However, it is probably not
a good idea to have the Debian package and upstream project with
slightly different names. So changing the upstream name is probably
something that I should consider as well.
I was thinking about `lenovo-rotate` as well, or
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package think-rotate
* Package name: think-rotate
Version : 3.0-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
9 matches
Mail list logo
