On Thursday 06 February 2014 03:51:47 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5. February 2014 13:29:06 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
>
> wrote:
> > We only need to wait for [...] and the full stack to properly age and
> > we are done :)
>
> Please check qgis, that did FTBFS on arm* with
>
Please check qgis, that did FTBFS on arm* with
deduced conflicting types for parameter 'const T' ('double' and 'qreal {aka
float}')
qgis seems to be using qt4. The qreal==double on all platforms switch
was only for qt5 (it's way too late to make such a change in qt4 now).
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Wednesday, 5. February 2014 13:29:06 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> We only need to wait for [...] and the full stack to properly age and
> we are done :)
Please check qgis, that did FTBFS on arm* with
deduced conflicting types for parameter 'const T' ('double' and 'qreal {aka
On Monday 03 February 2014 19:23:19 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Status update:
>
> - qgo and fcitx-qt5 are ready.
> - pyqt5 has been recently uploaded and only needs to get built in armhf.
> - We are still waiting for pokerth
> - and qtwebkit in armhf needs to get rebuilt.
pyqt5
Status update:
- qgo and fcitx-qt5 are ready.
- pyqt5 has been recently uploaded and only needs to get built in armhf.
- We are still waiting for pokerth
- and qtwebkit in armhf needs to get rebuilt.
Kinds regards, Lisandro.
--
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's
On Monday 03 February 2014 11:39:58 Julien Cristau wrote:
[snip]
> Scheduled.
>
> What about pokerth?
It's safe to binNMU too, thanks for pointing it out. But on the other hand
looking at it's B-D:
qtbase5-dev [!kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 !mips !mipsel !powerpc !hppa !ppc64
!x32],
libqt4-de
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 15:08:36 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> On Thursday 30 January 2014 23:07:27 Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 00:57:06 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
> > > As explained before, we are requesting a slot for this tr
On Sunday 02 February 2014 15:08:36 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
[snip]
> = What's not there yet:
>
> pyqt5: we still need qtx11extras-opensource-src to leave NEW due to package
> renaming.
algernon just pushed it, so we only need to wait for it and armhf to build.
I'll ping you la
On Thursday 30 January 2014 23:07:27 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 00:57:06 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > As explained before, we are requesting a slot for this transition.
>
> Go ahead. Ping this bug if/when you need binNMUs.
The needed parts of the Qt
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 00:57:06 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> As explained before, we are requesting a slot for this transition.
>
Go ahead. Ping this bug if/when you need binNMUs.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sunday 22 December 2013 16:24:28 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 00:57:06 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > As explained before
On Sunday 22 December 2013 16:24:28 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 00:57:06 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > As explained before
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:09:38 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> The patch that Dmitry pointed out in the bug against 5.1.1 (#731979, CCed)
> doesn't seems to apply.
I have now committed a bit different version (that works) to Git.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
signature.asc
Description: O
On Sunday 22 December 2013 16:24:28 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 00:57:06 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > As explained before
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 00:57:06 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> As explained before, we are requesting a slot for this transition.
>
Is the qtwebkit arm
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
As explained before, we are requesting a slot for this transition.
Affected packages:
- All the Qt 5 stack (all src:qt-opensource-src) needs source full upload
as usual. The packages h
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:01:06PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> On Friday 06 December 2013 16:02:50 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Best practice for the case where upstream has changed ABI without changing
> > SONAME is to keep the SONAME the same (for consistency with third-part
On Friday 06 December 2013 16:02:50 Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Best practice for the case where upstream has changed ABI without changing
> SONAME is to keep the SONAME the same (for consistency with third-party
> binaries), but to change the Debian package name.
>
> For past examples
Hi folks,
Best practice for the case where upstream has changed ABI without changing
SONAME is to keep the SONAME the same (for consistency with third-party
binaries), but to change the Debian package name.
For past examples of this, see the C++ c2a transition; the libc5/libc6 'g'
transition; the
2013/12/3 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer :
> So we think the best thing we could do is, for this very exceptional case, set
> qreal to double on all archs and break ABI on arm* and sh4, which could be
> fixed
> by [bin]NMUing the three apps that currently build-depend against it (I think
> py
On Wednesday 04 December 2013 20:38:09 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 15:09:18 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > So I would like what the RT and arm* porters thinks.
>
> This is just my opinion, but if you decide to break ABI, I think you
> should bump SONAME,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 15:09:18 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> So I would like what the RT and arm* porters thinks.
>
This is just my opinion, but if you decide to break ABI, I think you
should bump SONAME, and I think you must change package names.
Cheers,
Julien
signat
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
[snip]
> I've called other distro's maintainers in Qt's devel ML [QTMSG] with little
> feedback and over IRC to Fedora and OpenSuse people. Over Fedora lands, one
> Qt maintainer told me they where going to push the ABI cha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Note: people receiving this mail through the arm/ports/pkg-kde-talk mailing
list:
please reply to the bug.
Hi everyone! First of all please bare with me and try to read the whole mail
b
24 matches
Mail list logo
