Bug#731280: genshi 0.7, Python 3, and bug #731280

2013-12-13 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Hi, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org writes: On Dec 12, 2013, at 05:34 PM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: I must admit that I don't have so much time to maintain this package lately, so thank you very much for working on this, it's greatly appreciated. Oh, one other question: may I change the

Bug#731280: genshi 0.7, Python 3, and bug #731280

2013-12-13 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Dec 13, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: Oh, one other question: may I change the Maintainer field to the DPMT team and get rid of Uploaders? Yes, thanks. As it turns out, lintian doesn't like a team in Maintainers with no humans in Maintainers or Uploaders, so I put the DPMT in

Bug#731280: genshi 0.7, Python 3, and bug #731280

2013-12-12 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Hi, I must admit that I don't have so much time to maintain this package lately, so thank you very much for working on this, it's greatly appreciated. Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org writes: Hi Arnaud, As you can see, in bug #731280, I attached a patch that updates genshi to 0.7, adds Python

Bug#731280: genshi 0.7, Python 3, and bug #731280

2013-12-12 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Dec 12, 2013, at 05:34 PM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: I must admit that I don't have so much time to maintain this package lately, so thank you very much for working on this, it's greatly appreciated. You're welcome! And thank you for all your previous work on the package. Sorry if that's a

Bug#731280: genshi 0.7, Python 3, and bug #731280

2013-12-12 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org writes: On Dec 12, 2013, at 05:34 PM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: Sorry if that's a stupid question but I have not followed the development of pybuild, so the reason behind switching to pybuild is that it's much simpler (and thus debian/rules much shorter) for packages

Bug#731280: genshi 0.7, Python 3, and bug #731280

2013-12-12 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Dec 12, 2013, at 05:57 PM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: Well, sometimes it is useful to packages SVN snapshot, so perhaps it should uncommented but I would like to keep it anyway if possible... I've restored this stanza, keeping it commented out for now. Pending my other question, I think I'm