On 2016-01-31 21:30:17 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-01-19 10:44:06 [-0800], Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
Hi Jonathan,
> > > I package new upstream at
> > >git://git.breakpoint.cc/bigeasy/xz-utils-debian.git
> >
> > Beautiful. I'll merge this and make an
On 2016-01-19 10:44:06 [-0800], Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Jonathan,
> > I package new upstream at
> >git://git.breakpoint.cc/bigeasy/xz-utils-debian.git
>
> Beautiful. I'll merge this and make an upload today.
Is there something that you need to get done before the upload
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> control: -1 retitle new upstream version: 5.2.2
> On 2015-03-27 11:47:23 [-0700], Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> perhaps in a couple of weeks). I also don't mind if someone else
>> takes care of it for me and sends patches. ;-)
>
> I package new
control: -1 retitle new upstream version: 5.2.2
On 2015-03-27 11:47:23 [-0700], Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> perhaps in a couple of weeks). I also don't mind if someone else
> takes care of it for me and sends patches. ;-)
I package new upstream at
Does anyone still plan to do it? It's been a really long time since the
new parallelized version came out.
Hillel.
On Fri, 22 May 2015 17:31:37 +0200 (CEST) Fabio Pedretti fabio@libero.it
wrote:
Hi, is there any news on upgrading xz-utils?
Thanks!
I second this. The latest version supports both multithreaded compression and
decompression which is very valuable and can save a lot of time when using
As an alternative workaround while we wait, note that the pixz package
provides multithreading.
-- Mark
Hi, is there any news on upgrading xz-utils?
Thanks!
severity 731634 important
forcemerge 731634 777267
retitle 731634 xz-utils new upstream version: 5.2.1
thanks
Hi,
New version with threaded compression support would really be appreceated.
Riku
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
severity 731634 wishlist
quit
Hi,
Riku Voipio wrote:
New version with threaded compression support would really be appreceated.
Thanks for reporting.
[...]
severity 731634 important
Why important, though? Is there a package depending on this behavior,
a reason it is needed in stable, or
On Friday, March 27, 2015 7:32:26 PM EET, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
severity 731634 important
Why important, though? Is there a package depending on this behavior,
a reason it is needed in stable, or an unreported important bug that
is fixed by the upgrade?
Mostly because the other bug merged
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Friday, March 27, 2015 7:32:26 PM EET, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Why important, though?
[...]
Mostly because the other bug merged (#777267) was already important,
and severities need to match when merging. My interest in the new
version is the threaded compression support
12 matches
Mail list logo