Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 webkitgtk: confusing license statement for jsmin.py
Qoute from IRC:
17:57 nthykier paultag: Re: #732095 - it is marked serious, but
reading the log suggests we might not have a license issue after all.
Do you agree with the assertion and can we
forwarded 732095 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123665
tags 732095 + upstream
thanks
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:50:42PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
In light of that, I have decided to downgrade the severity to
non-RC. I still believe it would be prudent to get the update to
avoid
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
As mentioned in the upstream bug report, jsmin.py
isn't a derived work but a reimplementation, see
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsmin. Newer versions of jsmin.py don't
mention the original code copyright and license, and
Hi Paul,
On 13/12/13 22:33, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Package: webkitgtk
Severity: serious
User: paul...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
Howdy maintainers,
Package: webkitgtk
Severity: serious
User: paul...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
Howdy maintainers,
http://sources.debian.net/src/webkitgtk/2.3.2-1/Source/WebCore/inspector/Scripts/jsmin.py
I believe this file to be a derived work, and subject to
5 matches
Mail list logo
