Package: wine32
Version: 1.6.1-12
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Dear maintainer,
I've noticed that currently executing wine on any 32-bit package (or running wine32 - it's the same, since wine falls back to wine32) without setting the WINEPREFIX variable results in using $home/wine32 as default prefix, as determined by the line:

test -z $WINEPREFIX && export WINEPREFIX=$HOME/.wine32

This is in contrast with what the documentation says (and with the upstream behaviour):
WINEPREFIX
If set, the contents of this variable is taken as the name of the directory
              where  Wine  stores its data (the default is $HOME/.wine).

I also find that using separate prefixes for 32 and 64 bit wine is not convenient, because you need to keep any program you use in both prefixes installed twice, update it in both profiles, update all symlinks to windows drives (D:,...) twice and so on, which can IMO easily lead to confusion. Since 32 bit applications can run flawlessly from a 64 bit profile, I would suggest to simply remove that line from /usr/bin/wine32, and rather let those who want to keep profiles separated do that on their own, since this is the default upstream behaviour.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.11.8-desktop-f

Debian Release: jessie/sid
900 testing ftp.nluug.nl
900 solydxk ftp.nluug.nl
900 solydxk community.solydxk.com
850 testing debian.fastweb.it
800 unstable debian.fastweb.it
750 experimental debian.fastweb.it
500 wheezy linux.dropbox.com
500 home:ksmanis download.opensuse.org
400 testing debian.linuxmint.com
400 debian packages.linuxmint.com

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
===================================-+-==============
libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6~) |
libwine |
x11-utils |
libwine-gecko-1.4 |


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to