Hi Jakub,
On 2014-06-20 14:40, Jakub Wilk wrote:
[I'm not the maintainer of bash.]
* Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com, 2014-01-12, 00:23:
According to the part on test of bash's manpage:
1 argument
The expression is true if and only if the argument is not null.
Yet:
$ test 0; echo $?
0
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com, 2014-01-12, 00:23:
[I'm not the maintainer of bash.]
[I’m not the one who’s submitted this bug, either.]
According to the part on test of bash's manpage:
1 argument The expression is true if and only if
[I'm not the maintainer of bash.]
* Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com, 2014-01-12, 00:23:
According to the part on test of bash's manpage:
1 argument
The expression is true if and only if the argument is not null.
Yet:
$ test 0; echo $?
0
0 is not null, so the expression is true, so the
Package: bash
Version: 4.3~rc1-1
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: bash-...@gnu.org
According to the part on test of bash's manpage:
1 argument
The expression is true if and only if the argument is not null.
Yet:
$ test 0; echo $?
0
Given 1 argument, bash interprets the
4 matches
Mail list logo
