On 09/02/14 18:48, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 09/02/14 18:13, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
>> # pidof thermald
>> 20988
>> # strace -f -p 20988
>> [pid 20991] poll([{fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0},
>> {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0},
>
On 09/02/14 18:13, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> # pidof thermald
> 20988
> # strace -f -p 20988
> [pid 20991] poll([{fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0},
> {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0},
> {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=5, even
# pidof thermald
20988
# strace -f -p 20988
[pid 20991] poll([{fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0},
{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0,
events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}], 10, 4000) = 8 ([{fd=0,
revents=POLLERR|POLL
On 09/02/14 17:17, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> # strace -f -p `pidof thermald`
> Process 16506 attached with 2 threads - interrupt to quit
> [pid 16509] poll([{fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0},
> {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0},
> {fd
# strace -f -p `pidof thermald`
Process 16506 attached with 2 threads - interrupt to quit
[pid 16509] poll([{fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0},
{fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=0,
events=0}, {fd=0, events=0}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}]
On 09/02/14 08:23, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> # apt-get install thermald
> ... 1.1~rc2-6 ...
> # strace -p `pidof thermald`
> Process 13262 attached - interrupt to quit
> restart_syscall(<... resuming interrupted call ...>^C
> Process 13262 detached
> #
>
> I have waited 10s before hitting ^C, n
# apt-get install thermald
... 1.1~rc2-6 ...
# strace -p `pidof thermald`
Process 13262 attached - interrupt to quit
restart_syscall(<... resuming interrupted call ...>^C
Process 13262 detached
#
I have waited 10s before hitting ^C, nothing was happening.
The process did never stop eating CPU tim
On 07/02/14 23:37, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> I checked again, step by step. The process calms down when attached to
> gdb, and goes mad again as soon as I detach it.
>
One other thing to try is to get a trace of the running daemon using
strace, e.g.
su -c "strace -p `pidof thermald`"
--
To
I checked again, step by step. The process calms down when attached to
gdb, and goes mad again as soon as I detach it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 07/02/14 20:27, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> After installing glib-dev, I got something more useful.
>
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x7fd29aefb95d in poll () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> #1 0x7fd29c719194 in g_main_context_poll (priority=2147483647, n_fds=1,
> fds=0x1a89920, timeou
After installing glib-dev, I got something more useful.
(gdb) where
#0 0x7fd29aefb95d in poll () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1 0x7fd29c719194 in g_main_context_poll (priority=2147483647, n_fds=1,
fds=0x1a89920, timeout=-1, context=0x1a84130)
at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.36.
(gdb) where
#0 0x7f0acd3f895d in poll () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1 0x7f0acec16194 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 0x7f0acec165fa in g_main_loop_run ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 0x0040c49a in main ()
--
To UNSUB
On 31/01/14 21:54, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> No bug with a locally recompiled package.
>
> # aptitude purge thermald
> # aptitude install thermald # 1.1~rc2-4
> ... thermald process uses 100% cpu
> # aptitude purge thermald
> # apt-get source thermald # 1.1~rc2-4
> # pdebuild
> # dpkg -i $localp
No bug with a locally recompiled package.
# aptitude purge thermald
# aptitude install thermald # 1.1~rc2-4
... thermald process uses 100% cpu
# aptitude purge thermald
# apt-get source thermald # 1.1~rc2-4
# pdebuild
# dpkg -i $localpackage
... no bug
# debdiff $officialpackage $localpackage
File
On 30/01/14 11:08, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> # grep CPU | /proc/cpuinfo
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9300 @ 2.26GHz
> (twice)
>
> # sudo thermald --no-daemon --loglevel=debug >& debug.log
>
> # thermald --no-daemon --loglevel=debug >& debug.log
> did not trigger the bug.
# grep CPU | /proc/cpuinfo
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9300 @ 2.26GHz
(twice)
# sudo thermald --no-daemon --loglevel=debug >& debug.log
# thermald --no-daemon --loglevel=debug >& debug.log
did not trigger the bug. But
# aptitude purge thermald && aptitude instal thermald
di
On 30/01/14 07:57, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> Package: thermald
> Version: 1.1~rc2-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello.
>
> I installed thermald into testing. Ironically, a few minutes later the
> fan started to turn and top showed that thermald processus was eating
> 100 percent CPU.
> I may reinsta
Package: thermald
Version: 1.1~rc2-4
Severity: normal
Hello.
I installed thermald into testing. Ironically, a few minutes later the
fan started to turn and top showed that thermald processus was eating
100 percent CPU.
I may reinstall the package and investigate, if you tell me which
additionnal
18 matches
Mail list logo
