tags 738508 + wontfix
thanks
On 12-Feb-2014, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
So feel free to close this bug. I should really have done this
calculation before filing this bug.
No problem, thank you.
For future readers of this bug report: I am open to the possibility that
some future ‘python-coverage’
Hi Ben,
Thank you for filing this at “wishlist” severity. What do you think this
amount of storage is worth a new package? Bear in mind that new packages
also require an additional overhead of storage.
Currently I'm inclined to leave these files in the packages, until there is
at least an
On 10-Feb-2014, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
Currently python-coverage and python3-coverage ship some files in:
- /usr/share/python-coverage/htmlfiles
- /usr/share/python3-coverage/htmlfiles
Currently those files occupy less than 25KiB, in 6 files.
It looks to me that those files are identical,
Source: python-coverage
Version: 3.7+dfsg.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Currently python-coverage and python3-coverage ship some files in:
- /usr/share/python-coverage/htmlfiles
- /usr/share/python3-coverage/htmlfiles
It looks to me that those files are identical, so it is a waste of
4 matches
Mail list logo
