Hi Werner,
> Thanks for your reply. The current policyd-weight implementation honors the
> NULL-sender, passes
> emails with NULL-sender address and does not privide a possibiliy to change
> this behaviour, e.g.
> by config option.
>
> If you want to be able to change this behaviour (treating
Hi Ralf,
>> please refer to:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de/msg00721.html
>>
>> the current behaviour is disired and expected. You must let the NULL-sender
>> (mainly generated
>> by DSNs) pass/accept no matter what the policy says.
>
> That was an interesting
Hi Werner,
> please refer to:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de/msg00721.html
>
> the current behaviour is disired and expected. You must let the NULL-sender
> (mainly generated
> by DSNs) pass/accept no matter what the policy says.
That was an interesting read, th
Hi Ralf,
please refer to:
https://www.mail-archive.com/policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de/msg00721.html
the current behaviour is disired and expected. You must let the NULL-sender
(mainly generated
by DSNs) pass/accept no matter what the policy says.
Cheers,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: policyd-weight
Version: 0.1.15.2-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
policyd-weight will always reply "DUNNO" when processing a mail with an empty
envelope sender. This allows spammers to bypass the filter.
Steps to reproduce:
>From some remote system, telnet to the server and send
HELO
5 matches
Mail list logo
