* Osamu Aoki , 2014-04-05, 23:30:
License: GPL-2.0+ with incorrect FSF address, and with autoconf
exception
FWIW, this line does not conform to the copyright format
specification.
What is the offending part? "GPL-2.0+" or "with ..."?
The latter.
As for "with ..." part, I am following "An exc
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:45:25PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Osamu Aoki , 2014-04-04, 01:16:
> >License: GPL-2.0+ with incorrect FSF address, and with autoconf exception
>
> FWIW, this line does not conform to the copyright format specification.
What is the offending part? "GPL-2.0+" or "
* Osamu Aoki , 2014-04-04, 01:16:
License: GPL-2.0+ with incorrect FSF address, and with autoconf
exception
FWIW, this line does not conform to the copyright format specification.
For me copying "license" text including some associated disclaimer
exactly from the original source seems to be t
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.22.1
Severity: normal
Please do not make lintian report this warning of
W: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
if the license synopsis line has "with incorrect FSF address".
Here is an example. Lintian reports as:
W: ... old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
for debian/c
4 matches
Mail list logo
