Bug#743796: flash-kernel: kirkwood+ should be considered the same as kirkwood

On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 18:24 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > John Hughes (2014-04-06): > > Package: flash-kernel > > Version: 3.3+deb7u2 > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > >* What led up to the situation? > > > > Built a custom kernel with make-kpkg > > > >* What exactl

Bug#743796: flash-kernel: kirkwood+ should be considered the same as kirkwood

John Hughes (2014-04-06): > Package: flash-kernel > Version: 3.3+deb7u2 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > >* What led up to the situation? > > Built a custom kernel with make-kpkg > >* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > > I built

Bug#743796: flash-kernel: kirkwood+ should be considered the same as kirkwood

Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.3+deb7u2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Built a custom kernel with make-kpkg * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I built it in the directory containing the .git subdirectory