On 17/04/15 at 22:30 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 13:14:55 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I'm closing this bug, because:
- The derivatives information is now gathered in a single table titled
'Derivatives', which makes it clear that it is not centered on Ubuntu.
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 13:14:55 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I'm closing this bug, because:
- The derivatives information is now gathered in a single table titled
'Derivatives', which makes it clear that it is not centered on Ubuntu.
- That table is that the bottom of the page, making it
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:04:36AM +0200, Christophe Siraut wrote:
Such an explicit option would actually make us pay more attention to the
derivatives IMO. Let people read what they want to, without asking :)
This is the argumentation I never understand: why adding an option about
Ana Guerrero Lopez écrivait:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:04:36AM +0200, Christophe Siraut wrote:
Such an explicit option would actually make us pay more attention to the
derivatives IMO. Let people read what they want to, without asking :)
This is the argumentation I never understand:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
I don't have a particularly strong opinion on whether Ubuntu bugs should be
displayed in the dashboard by default; but I don't have the impression that
people who are objecting to it are doing so out of a desire to improve
Debian, only
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:34:51PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
[18:20] h01ger | is there a way to hide the ubuntu table in
http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi ? i'm really not interested in that
commercial product...
I'm biased, so I'm responding with the most biased email I have.
On 22/04/14 at 15:01 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Based on a survey of the bug links in the Debian derivatives census,
only Ubuntu and UltimediaOS assign bugs to individual packages. The
latter doesn't appear to have an easy way to link to bugs for
individual packages.
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:56:41AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Its display can be optional (default enabled so that people know it is there
and only those bothered by it -- a minority -- will need to take action to
disable it), though. That's fine.
My feelings are totally
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 04:38:31PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:56:41AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Its display can be optional (default enabled so that people know it is there
and only those bothered by it -- a minority -- will need to take action to
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 01:37:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 04:38:31PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:56:41AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Its display can be optional (default enabled so that people know it is
there
and
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Vincent Cheng wrote:
I find it convenient and rather helpful to display Ubuntu-specific
data about my packages on UDD and other similar resources (PTS/DDPO),
and I'd rather not see this feature outright removed. I have no
I outright object its removal. Ubuntu has a lot of
package: qa.debian.org
Hi,
[18:20] h01ger | is there a way to hide the ubuntu table in
http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi ? i'm really not interested in that
commercial product...
[18:28] h01ger | SamB: also there are other useful commercial
products, also debian based. i dont
I couldn't agree more with this. Please remove Ubuntu or hide it by default.
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov
GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
package: qa.debian.org
Hi,
[18:20] h01ger | is there a way to hide the ubuntu table in
http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi ? i'm really not interested in that
commercial product...
[18:28] h01ger | SamB: also
14 matches
Mail list logo
