Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2016-05-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 29/04/16 22:33, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> We talked about this on the RT meeting yesterday and agreed to bump >> this to RC again. We wouldn't like to release Stretch with guile-1.8 >> just for lilypond's sake, and it is better to act now that

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2016-04-29 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > We talked about this on the RT meeting yesterday and agreed to bump > this to RC again. We wouldn't like to release Stretch with guile-1.8 > just for lilypond's sake, and it is better to act now that there's > plenty of time before the freeze so

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2016-04-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: severity -1 serious Hi, We talked about this on the RT meeting yesterday and agreed to bump this to RC again. We wouldn't like to release Stretch with guile-1.8 just for lilypond's sake, and it is better to act now that there's plenty of time before the freeze so that a new version can

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2015-12-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 06/05/15 16:41, Don Armstrong wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > On Tue, 05 May 2015, Rob Browning wrote: >> Don Armstrong writes: >> >>> At this juncture, I'm OK with expending the effort myself to keep >>> guile-1.8 working with lilypond as the sole reverse

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2015-12-09 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 06/05/15 16:41, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Control: severity -1 important > > > > On Tue, 05 May 2015, Rob Browning wrote: > >> Don Armstrong writes: > >> > >>> At this juncture, I'm OK with expending the effort myself

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2015-05-06 Thread Don Armstrong
Control: severity -1 important On Tue, 05 May 2015, Rob Browning wrote: Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes: At this juncture, I'm OK with expending the effort myself to keep guile-1.8 working with lilypond as the sole reverse dependency if that's what is required. [Unfortunately,

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2015-05-05 Thread Rob Browning
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes: At this juncture, I'm OK with expending the effort myself to keep guile-1.8 working with lilypond as the sole reverse dependency if that's what is required. [Unfortunately, I don't have enough time or expertise to actually solve the issues with the

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2015-05-05 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 29/04/15 14:29, Don Armstrong wrote: Upstream has been working on porting, but there are some serious issues with guile 2.0 which have not yet been resolved. I agree that this should be fixed before stretch, but I don't think that

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2015-05-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 29/04/15 14:29, Don Armstrong wrote: On April 29, 2015 2:52:53 AM CDT, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: So guile-1.8 got into jessie just for lilypond. I'm going to remove both from testing now - there should be plenty of time to get lilypond ported to guile-2.0 and back

Bug#746005: Re: Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2015-04-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: severity -1 serious On 21/09/14 23:05, Rob Browning wrote: Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes: What are your thoughts about supporting guile 1.8 for another release? I'd likely prefer that to dropping lilypond, so no worries. Let's see where we end up. If you can,

Bug#746005: Re: Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2015-04-29 Thread Don Armstrong
On April 29, 2015 2:52:53 AM CDT, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: So guile-1.8 got into jessie just for lilypond. I'm going to remove both from testing now - there should be plenty of time to get lilypond ported to guile-2.0 and back into testing for the Stretch release. Cheers,

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2014-09-21 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Rob Browning wrote: Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes: Should have guessed as much. Upstream probably just doesn't use it. Thanks! Certainly -- shout if I can help with anything else. I finally got back into trying to make guile 2.0 work, and apparently there

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2014-09-21 Thread Rob Browning
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes: What are your thoughts about supporting guile 1.8 for another release? I'd likely prefer that to dropping lilypond, so no worries. Let's see where we end up. If you can, keep an eye on any critical deadlines and ping me if needed (i.e. if I need to

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2014-09-12 Thread Don Armstrong
Currently guile-2.0-dev installs to /usr/include/guile/2.0, which makes the migration more difficult than merely switching guile-1.8-dev for guile-2.0-dev... is this the way it's going to stay? -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com There is no more concentrated form

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2014-09-12 Thread Rob Browning
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes: Currently guile-2.0-dev installs to /usr/include/guile/2.0, which makes the migration more difficult than merely switching guile-1.8-dev for guile-2.0-dev... is this the way it's going to stay? Would guile-config compile help? (And there's also a

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2014-09-12 Thread Don Armstrong
On September 12, 2014 8:17:09 PM PDT, Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org wrote: Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes: Currently guile-2.0-dev installs to /usr/include/guile/2.0, which makes the migration more difficult than merely switching guile-1.8-dev for guile-2.0-dev... is this the

Bug#746005: guile-2.0 migration

2014-09-12 Thread Rob Browning
Don Armstrong d...@donarmstrong.com writes: Should have guessed as much. Upstream probably just doesn't use it. Thanks! Certainly -- shout if I can help with anything else. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B