Bug#746858: Status of igstk (should we remove the package?)

2014-08-21 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On August 21, 2014 09:50:56 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > as you might have noticed igstk is RC buggy and also lagging behind > upstream (5.2). If nobody has any interest in keeping the package alive I don't use the package and have no intention of maintaining it, I'm afraid. -Steve -- T

Bug#746858: Status of igstk (should we remove the package?)

2014-08-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dominique, On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:56:42AM -0400, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > I think you are right, this is a good time to go forward with the removal > request. Could you please also give some reasons for Debian Med mailing list readers why we are stopping to support so

Bug#746858: Status of igstk (should we remove the package?)

2014-08-21 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Hi Andreas, I think you are right, this is a good time to go forward with the removal request. -Dominique On Aug 21, 2014 3:54 AM, "Andreas Tille" wrote: > Hi, > > as you might have noticed igstk is RC buggy and also lagging behind > upstream (5.2). If nobody has any interest in keeping the pa

Bug#746858: Status of igstk (should we remove the package?)

2014-08-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, as you might have noticed igstk is RC buggy and also lagging behind upstream (5.2). If nobody has any interest in keeping the package alive we might consider droping it from the archive. What do you think? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to