On August 21, 2014 09:50:56 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you might have noticed igstk is RC buggy and also lagging behind
> upstream (5.2). If nobody has any interest in keeping the package alive
I don't use the package and have no intention of maintaining it, I'm afraid.
-Steve
--
T
Hi Dominique,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:56:42AM -0400, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I think you are right, this is a good time to go forward with the removal
> request.
Could you please also give some reasons for Debian Med mailing list
readers why we are stopping to support so
Hi Andreas,
I think you are right, this is a good time to go forward with the removal
request.
-Dominique
On Aug 21, 2014 3:54 AM, "Andreas Tille" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you might have noticed igstk is RC buggy and also lagging behind
> upstream (5.2). If nobody has any interest in keeping the pa
Hi,
as you might have noticed igstk is RC buggy and also lagging behind
upstream (5.2). If nobody has any interest in keeping the package alive
we might consider droping it from the archive.
What do you think?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
4 matches
Mail list logo