Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.20~deb7u1

2014-05-04 Thread Stefano Rivera
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, can we please update distro-info-data, to add the next Ubuntu release, 14.10 - Utopic Unicorn. There are also a couple of minor support date updates, included, trivial

Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.20~deb7u1

2014-05-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Stefano. Stefano Rivera stefa...@debian.org (2014-05-04): There are also a couple of minor support date updates, included, trivial packaging changes, and a bugfix to the Debian release versions. I don't think that risks regressions. As in the past, e.g. #727020, I'd be nice if this could

Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.20~deb7u1

2014-05-04 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Cyril (2014.05.04_13:03:22_+0200) Adding an Ubuntu entry would look OK to me. Updating dates, probably so. Changing behaviour in stable doesn't look right to me. Who knows how many packages and local scripts rely on the current output? Yeah, I'm fine with not including that bit. It is

Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.20~deb7u1

2014-05-04 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 01:03:22PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Stefano Rivera stefa...@debian.org (2014-05-04): There are also a couple of minor support date updates, included, trivial packaging changes, and a bugfix to the Debian release versions. I don't think that risks regressions.

Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.20~deb7u1

2014-05-04 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Philipp (2014.05.04_22:50:53_+0200) I'd argue that 8 would be right for Jessie and 7.0 somewhat wrong for Wheezy, hence I'd tend to agree to the change. Stefano, where is this used? I don't know of anything that uses the --release flag (or that data). It's possible that people use it in