Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-08-09 Thread Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Brian May wrote on 2014-08-09 10:28: > So it makes sense not to use it, but I don't see any justification > for repackaging the orig.tar.gz file. > > Did I miss something? The idea was to save archive space by not shipping duplicated code in the so

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-08-09 Thread Brian May
On 29 July 2014 22:29, Michael Fladischer wrote: > > I also note that the version number was called 1.5.0+dfsg-1, which > > suggests you had to repackage the orig.tar.gz file - was this the case? > > See debian/copyright. I excluded the whole embedded librabbitmq-c > library. Thus the +dfsg suffi

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-07-29 Thread Michael Fladischer
On 2014-07-28 07:42, Brian May wrote: > Seems like there was already an attempt to package 1.5.0 (1.5.2 is now > current), based on changes in subversion. > > Did this not work out? It did work out to the point where one should be able to build the package, but I did not find the time to test it.

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq

2014-07-27 Thread Brian May
Hello, Seems like there was already an attempt to package 1.5.0 (1.5.2 is now current), based on changes in subversion. Did this not work out? I note that the debian/patches/fix_setup.patch has extensive changes to setup.py (this no longer applies cleanly). I also note that the version number w

Bug#747270: [Python-modules-team] Bug#747270: python-librabbitmq unusable

2014-07-20 Thread Brian May
On 21 July 2014 11:37, Brian May wrote: > > I believe this bug makes python-amqp unusable, and as a result, Grave is > justified. > Sorry, doing to many thing at once. I sent the bug report to the correct place, but it affects python-librabbitmq, not python-amqp. python-amqp is GOOD. -- Brian M