Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote...
[...]
>>> CHECK-SUPPORT-STATUS(1)
>>> ===
>>>
>>> NAME
>>>
>>> check-support-status - check installed packages for ended security support
>>
>> (Should that perhaps be "reduced security support"?)
>
> Remainder of an early d
Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote...
>> Talking about "the regular security maintenance life cycle" worked in
>> the templates, but here it's not clear what "life cycle" you're
>> talking about - it might be the "software life cycle" (from
>> proof-of-concept to mature project to death-by
Quoting Christoph Biedl (debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de):
> Justin B Rye wrote...
>
> > Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > >> I gather this template text is echoed by runtime messages from
> > >> binaries in the package (since there's a messages.po with the same
> > >> grammar problem). Should I give y
Justin B Rye wrote...
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
> >> I gather this template text is echoed by runtime messages from
> >> binaries in the package (since there's a messages.po with the same
> >> grammar problem). Should I give you a patch for that too?
> >
> > Would be a good idea, yes. Same for
Hi there,
going through these template checks is somehow similar to root canal
treatment: It's done with best intentions, it actually doesn't hurt
that much but still isn't a very pleasant experience. Trust me, I've
been through both. Having said that, part of the lame excuse why I
didn't get back
Justin B Rye wrote:
>> *--dpkg-query* 'COMAND'::
> COMMAND
Sorry, missing from the patch - revised version attached.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
--- debian-security-supp
Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> I gather this template text is echoed by runtime messages from
>> binaries in the package (since there's a messages.po with the same
>> grammar problem). Should I give you a patch for that too?
>
> Would be a good idea, yes. Same for the manpage.
I may be doing this w
Quoting Justin B Rye (justin.byam@gmail.com):
> No, "needed" is simple past, which implies that the situation
> described (i.e. the need for curtailed security support) has ended;
> what we want here is present perfect (the "has" construction), which
> implies that the situation described has
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Rationale:
> --- debian-security-support.old/debian/debian-security-support.templates
> 2014-05-17 08:16:08.229777212 +0200
> +++ debian-security-support/debian/debian-security-support.templates
> 2014-05-17 08:18:22.759776423 +0200
> @@ -1,18 +1,20 @@
> Template
Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for
the debian-security-support source package.
This review will last from Saturday, May 17, 2014 to Tuesday, May 27, 2014.
Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original
files. Comments about your prop
10 matches
Mail list logo
