Bug#748599: Packages must not depend on libavcodec-extra-NN

2014-05-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > That is correct, and I'm not arguing with that. It makes only sense > for packages that only execute avconv, and do link against directly > against libavcodec. This was the case for #748546. Sorry, that meant to be read as ... and do NOT

Bug#748599: Packages must not depend on libavcodec-extra-NN

2014-05-28 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Thanks for the bug report. > > * Reinhard Tartler , 2014-05-18, 13:43: >> >> The libav package provides two flavors of libavcodec: libavcodecNN and >> libavcodec-extra-NN, with NN being the current soname (the current >> transition changes NN fr

Bug#748599: Packages must not depend on libavcodec-extra-NN

2014-05-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
Thanks for the bug report. * Reinhard Tartler , 2014-05-18, 13:43: The libav package provides two flavors of libavcodec: libavcodecNN and libavcodec-extra-NN, with NN being the current soname (the current transition changes NN from -54 -> 55). It is not a good idea for packages to depend on l

Bug#748599: Packages must not depend on libavcodec-extra-NN

2014-05-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: lintian Hi, The libav package provides two flavors of libavcodec: libavcodecNN and libavcodec-extra-NN, with NN being the current soname (the current transition changes NN from -54 -> 55). It is not a good idea for packages to depend on libavcodec-extra-NN in any case. Instead, packages