Hi Adam & William,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014, at 9:29, William Dauchy wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
> > "Simple backports from upstream" is not equivalent to "suitable for an
> > update to a package in stable", particularly when there's a non-trivial
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> "Simple backports from upstream" is not equivalent to "suitable for an
> update to a package in stable", particularly when there's a non-trivial diff
> involved.
All the backported fixes are bugs which make the package more stabl
On 2014-06-18 10:05, William Dauchy wrote:
Do you need any help to validate this package? As a reminder all these
fixes are simple backports from upstream.
"Simple backports from upstream" is not equivalent to "suitable for an
update to a package in stable", particularly when there's a non-tri
Hi release team,
Do you need any help to validate this package? As a reminder all these
fixes are simple backports from upstream.
In addition I have been using this version on production with
thousands of users.
I'm also waiting for this validation in order to submit a new one with
more stable fix
4 matches
Mail list logo
