On 09/14/2014 10:14 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Please remind me, what was the autoreconf problem, and how has it been
fixed upstream? I'm really not comfortable with uploading an about
500kb diff.
I agree, having that patch in the actual package is not an option, it's
huge, opaque and will
On 09/10/2014 12:18 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
The upcoming release includes the autotools changes which make
dh-autoreconf work.
That's great news! :-)
Sadly the wx3.0 patch needs adjustment to apply to svn head. Can you
update the patch to apply cleanly to svn head? Upstream will be happy
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Martin Steghöfer mar...@steghoefer.eu wrote:
On 09/09/2014 12:56 PM, Olly Betts wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 12:43:26PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
If it helps, I can post a new version of the patch including Olly's
proposed change. Would that help?
Hi Reinhard!
Thanks for looking into this issue!
On 09/09/2014 04:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I wonder what's the status of this bug. The most recent email did not
help to clarify,
I'm sorry, I guess the side discussions didn't help to understand the
situation, so here a quick summary:
Control: severity -1 serious
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:12:37PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I wonder what's the status of this bug. The most recent email did not
help to clarify, so I test-compiled wx3.0.patch as proposed in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749659#35, and
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 12:43:26PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
So we're basically waiting for a maintainer to incorporate the
patches (including the modification) in the package, update the
build dependencies and upload the whole thing. Olly proposed to NMU
the package, but there was no
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Olly Betts o...@survex.com wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:12:37PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I wonder what's the status of this bug. The most recent email did not
help to clarify, so I test-compiled wx3.0.patch as proposed in
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.09.2014, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Olly Betts:
The maintainers should also decide if they want to accept the
configure script patch or if they want to modify the package so
autoconf automatically recreates them.
Bottom-line: The main work is done, but in order to move
Control: tag -1 -patch
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi,
I wonder what's the status of this bug. The most recent email did not
help to clarify, so I test-compiled wx3.0.patch as proposed in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749659#35, and can
confirm that the package builds fine.
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:17:42PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
Last weekend I was able to work on this bug. I managed to compile and run
audacity with wxWidgets 3.0 successfully. However, there are still a few
issues to resolve (mainly by wxWidgets upstream).
Hi Olly!
El 30/08/14 a les 18:58, Olly Betts ha escrit:
The amended code here assumes sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(long long) - that's not
true on all architectures (both i386 and armel have 4 vs 8, for example).
True that. I should have kept that in mind, I've seen the problem
several times in
Am Sonntag, den 31.08.2014, 00:05 +0200 schrieb Martin Steghöfer:
Hi Olly!
El 30/08/14 a les 18:58, Olly Betts ha escrit:
The amended code here assumes sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(long long) - that's
not
true on all architectures (both i386 and armel have 4 vs 8, for example).
True
El 31/08/14 a les 00:22, Benjamin Drung ha escrit:
The C99 standard allows printing size_t with %zu, but Microsoft
Visual Studio needs %Iu instead [1]. [1]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/tcxf1dw6.aspx
Thanks for the hint! But unfortunately that's only C99, but neither
C++11
13 matches
Mail list logo
