On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 23:45:24 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 02/06/14 20:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2014-06-02 19:59:41, Petr Salinger wrote:
I'm not sure if the file should be built on kfreebsd/hurd, or if it
shouldn't but there should be some fallback code in python3.4.
On 02/06/14 20:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2014-06-02 19:59:41, Petr Salinger wrote:
I'm not sure if the file should be built on kfreebsd/hurd, or if it
shouldn't
but there should be some fallback code in python3.4. Adding the python
maintainer, and the bsd and hurd porters to Cc.
Control: severity -1 important
reassigning and keeping that release critical is odd. This is a buildd issue,
and should be better tracked as such.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2014-06-02 19:59:41, Petr Salinger wrote:
I'm not sure if the file should be built on kfreebsd/hurd, or if it
shouldn't
but there should be some fallback code in python3.4. Adding the python
maintainer, and the bsd and hurd porters to Cc.
checking on falla, the failing autoconf test is
I'm not sure if the file should be built on kfreebsd/hurd, or if it shouldn't
but there should be some fallback code in python3.4. Adding the python
maintainer, and the bsd and hurd porters to Cc.
checking on falla, the failing autoconf test is
#include unistd.h
#include fcntl.h
#include
5 matches
Mail list logo
