* James McCoy james...@debian.org, 2014-10-11, 22:35:
I think it would be more user-friendly if sadt did this:
* If sadt have to make copy of the source tree anyway (i.e., one of
the tests declares the rw-build-tree restriction), then fix
permissions in the copy.
Now I noticed that support
Hi James,
Thanks for prodding me. I've been procrastinating for far too long.
* James McCoy james...@debian.org, 2014-10-09, 22:09:
I suggest that sadt skips non executable tests with a warning and
documents this behaviour (as it does with missing dependencies), or
displays a warning when
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 07:14:04PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
I think it would be more user-friendly if sadt did this:
* If sadt have to make copy of the source tree anyway (i.e., one of the
tests declares the rw-build-tree restriction), then fix permissions in the
copy.
* Otherwise, try
Hi Jakub,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:54:10PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Nicolas Boulenguez nico...@debian.org, 2014-05-30, 23:05:
I suggest that sadt skips non executable tests with a warning and
documents this behaviour (as it does with missing dependencies), or
displays a warning when
Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 devscripts
Control: retitle -1 [sadt] please skip non-executable tests
Control: owner -1 !
* Nicolas Boulenguez nico...@debian.org, 2014-05-30, 23:05:
I suggest that sadt skips non executable tests with a warning and
documents this behaviour (as it does
5 matches
Mail list logo
