Am 23.07.2018 um 11:55 schrieb Nikolaus Rath:
> Oh, bummer. I thought that file would be created by the kernel package
> itself in its postinst. Wouldn't this be a good idea?
Fwiw, there is now this upstream PR
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/9719
specifically
On Jul 22 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 10:54 +0100, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On Jul 21 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > > > Prior to installing systemd, hibernating was not possible after a
>> > > > kernel
>> > > > update. I believe the mechanism to prevent it was a
>> > > >
On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 10:54 +0100, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Jul 21 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > Prior to installing systemd, hibernating was not possible after a kernel
> > > > update. I believe the mechanism to prevent it was a
> > > > /run/do-not-hibernate file that is not used by
On Jul 21 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > Prior to installing systemd, hibernating was not possible after a kernel
>> > update. I believe the mechanism to prevent it was a
>> > /run/do-not-hibernate file that is not used by systemd.
>>
>> Is there a distro-agnostic way to determine whether it's
On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 00:33 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2014 19:11:25 -0700 Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > Package: systemd
> > Version: 204-8
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> >
> > 'systemctl hibernate' (and probably other methods to hibernate
On Thu, 29 May 2014 19:11:25 -0700 Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 204-8
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> 'systemctl hibernate' (and probably other methods to hibernate when
> systemd is installed, I tested only the command) hibernates the
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:41:44 +0200 Zbigniew
=?utf-8?Q?J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:00:12PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > On 05/30/2014 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Am 30.05.2014 18:34, schrieb Nikolaus Rath:
> > >>>
> > >>> The problem with simply doing
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:00:12PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
On 05/30/2014 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 30.05.2014 18:34, schrieb Nikolaus Rath:
The problem with simply doing nothing on hibernate when
/run/do-not-hibernate exists, is that this is also not visible to the
user
Am 30.05.2014 04:11, schrieb Nikolaus Rath:
Package: systemd
Version: 204-8
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
'systemctl hibernate' (and probably other methods to hibernate when
systemd is installed, I tested only the command) hibernates the system
even if a new
Hi Michael,
On 05/30/2014 06:06 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 30.05.2014 04:11, schrieb Nikolaus Rath:
Package: systemd
Version: 204-8
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
'systemctl hibernate' (and probably other methods to hibernate when
systemd is installed, I
Am 30.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Nikolaus Rath:
- new kernel is silently installed by unattended-upgrades (apparently
this happens even when the new package breaks the ABI) and becomes the
default to be loaded by the bootloader
- there's no visible indication that this happened, so I hibernate
On 05/30/2014 09:20 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 30.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Nikolaus Rath:
- new kernel is silently installed by unattended-upgrades (apparently
this happens even when the new package breaks the ABI) and becomes the
default to be loaded by the bootloader
- there's no visible
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote (30 May 2014 16:20:56 GMT) :
Well, the grub menu entry carries the kernel version in the description.
But I acknowledge that one can miss that.
Data point: in my test sid VM, with GRUB 2.02~beta2-10, the only GRUB
entries I see are:
* Debian GNU/Linux
* Advanced
Am 30.05.2014 18:34, schrieb Nikolaus Rath:
The problem with simply doing nothing on hibernate when
/run/do-not-hibernate exists, is that this is also not visible to the
user since there there is no API to communicate that to the user why
hibernate did not succeed.
Well, in my case I'm
On 05/30/2014 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 30.05.2014 18:34, schrieb Nikolaus Rath:
The problem with simply doing nothing on hibernate when
/run/do-not-hibernate exists, is that this is also not visible to the
user since there there is no API to communicate that to the user why
15 matches
Mail list logo
