On Monday, April 27, 2015 03:27:16 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, April 27, 2015 02:47:00 PM James Cloos wrote:
> > opendkim could depend on dns-root-data and have:
> >
> > TrustAnchorFile /usr/share/dns/root.key
> >
> > in the default opendkim.conf.
> >
> > I've been using TrustAnchorFi
On Monday, April 27, 2015 02:47:00 PM James Cloos wrote:
> opendkim could depend on dns-root-data and have:
>
> TrustAnchorFile /usr/share/dns/root.key
>
> in the default opendkim.conf.
>
> I've been using TrustAnchorFile /var/lib/unbound/root.key on my MXs for
> the longer of:
>
> as long as
opendkim could depend on dns-root-data and have:
TrustAnchorFile /usr/share/dns/root.key
in the default opendkim.conf.
I've been using TrustAnchorFile /var/lib/unbound/root.key on my MXs for
the longer of:
as long as opendkim has supported TrustAnchorFile
or
as long as I've run opendkim
(I
On Monday, April 27, 2015 07:54:50 PM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 08:47:21AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Monday, April 27, 2015 12:36:06 PM cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
> > > > but I did add unbound to suggests and update the shipped config file
> > > > to include a commented
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 08:47:21AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, April 27, 2015 12:36:06 PM cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
> > > but I did add unbound to suggests and update the shipped config file
> > > to include a commented out entry about this to make it easy to enable
> > > for those th
On Monday, April 27, 2015 09:57:06 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, April 27, 2015 09:48:47 AM James Cloos wrote:
> > > "SK" == Scott Kitterman writes:
> SK> The package is compiled with and linked against libunbound. I don't
> have SK> DNSSEC, so I can't test this. Reading the docume
On Monday, April 27, 2015 09:48:47 AM James Cloos wrote:
> > "SK" == Scott Kitterman writes:
SK> The package is compiled with and linked against libunbound. I don't have
SK> DNSSEC, so I can't test this. Reading the documentation, I think you
SK> additionally have to install unbound (not ju
> "SK" == Scott Kitterman writes:
SK> The package is compiled with and linked against libunbound. I don't have
SK> DNSSEC, so I can't test this. Reading the documentation, I think you
SK> additionally have to install unbound (not just the lib) and configure it
with a
SK> trust anchor.
On Monday, April 27, 2015 12:36:06 PM cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
> > but I did add unbound to suggests and update the shipped config file
> > to include a commented out entry about this to make it easy to enable
> > for those that have DNSSEC.
>
> That commented-out line is of no value; uncommenting
> but I did add unbound to suggests and update the shipped config file
> to include a commented out entry about this to make it easy to enable
> for those that have DNSSEC.
That commented-out line is of no value; uncommenting it generates an
unrecognized config error on restart.
OpenDKIM only sup
On Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:51:03 AM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: opendkim
> Version: 2.9.2-1
> Severity: important
>
> It seems that opendkim has support for DNSSEC, is compiled with
> unbound, but the default config does not enable DNSSEC.
It looks like DNSSEC needs both a defined trust anch
Package: opendkim
Version: 2.9.2-1
Severity: important
It seems that opendkim has support for DNSSEC, is compiled with
unbound, but the default config does not enable DNSSEC.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
12 matches
Mail list logo
