Seems fine. Feel free to NMU. Don't have the spare cycles to do it myself right
now
On 19 Jun 2014 07:03, Dmitry Shachnev mity...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jo,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:14:48 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
So, the Metacity support is already broken, and if we remove it,
nothing
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 07:50:39AM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
Seems fine. Feel free to NMU. Don't have the spare cycles to do it myself
right now
Please commit to git when you upload. I don't know if you're a DD or
not, so ping me with a branch or patch if you want sponsorship.
--
Iain Lane
Hi Iain, thanks for offering your help!
I am not a DD yet (but in a process of becoming one), so I have
pushed it here:
git://git.debian.org/users/mitya57-guest/monodevelop.git
It would be nice if you uploaded it. Feel free to convert to
team upload, if you prefer that.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
Control: tags -1 +patch
Dear Maintainers,
First, here is a message that I got from Alberts Muktupāvels (CCed):
Does it really work with metacity themes? Just checked source code
(upstream). They are trying to load metacity theme name from gconf,
but it is not used anymore so they end up
Source: monodevelop
Version: 4.0.12+dfsg-2
Dear Maintainer,
I am going to upload Metacity 3.12 to archives, which has been ported
to Gtk+ 3.0 [1]. As I understand it, it will break monodevelop, as the
latter still uses Gtk+ 2.0. Monodevelop is the *only* package in Debian
that uses Metacity’s
5 matches
Mail list logo
