On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 14:12:49 Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> But this means that we could drop the telinit u from the libsepol
> postinst script, correct?
Yes.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-di
Le Sat, 05 Jul 2014 20:11:44 +1000,
Russell Coker a écrit :
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 11:03:32 Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Quickly looking a the libsepol case, I'm not sure why we are
> > re-executing init in this case at all. sysvinit doesn't seems to use
> > any of its symbols and libselinux itsel
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 11:03:32 Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Quickly looking a the libsepol case, I'm not sure why we are
> re-executing init in this case at all. sysvinit doesn't seems to use
> any of its symbols and libselinux itself is statically linked against
> it.
>
> Or did I overlooked somethin
Le Sat, 05 Jul 2014 11:46:08 +1000,
Russell Coker a écrit :
> > The current version of libselinux1.postint runs "telinit u" to tell
> > init to re-exec itself. This was added so the system can shutdown
> > cleanly when sysvinit is the active PID 1.
>
> AFAIK that was never the case.
>
> The rea
4 matches
Mail list logo
