On 10.06.2015 08:58, Mark Wielaard wrote:
- The hppa elfutils backend isn't upstream (yet?).
That seems correct. Would upstream be willing to include the hppa patches?
- Note the ELF_F_PERMISSIVE flag.
You could run the testcase with strip --permissive which passes that flag.
Yes, but
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 15:23 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
On 10.06.2015 08:58, Mark Wielaard wrote:
- The hppa elfutils backend isn't upstream (yet?).
That seems correct. Would upstream be willing to include the hppa patches?
Sure.
On 2015-06-09, at 6:20 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
(gdb) p *shdr
$3 = {sh_name = 133, sh_type = 8, sh_flags = 7, sh_addr = 113608, sh_offset =
352, sh_size = 1108, sh_link = 0, sh_info = 0, sh_addralign = 4, sh_entsize =
8}
(gdb) p *shdr
$1 = {sh_name = 249, sh_type = 1, sh_flags = 7, sh_addr
I did some debugging on this issue.
The failure of the run-strip-reloc.sh testcase can be reproduced by this command (which
runs strip on the own strip executable):
/build/elfutils/elfutils-0.159/src/strip -o out.stripped1 -f out.debug1
/build/elfutils/elfutils-0.159/src/strip
This command
Package: elfutils
Version: 0.158-2
Severity: normal
See build log:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=elfutilsarch=hppaver=0.159-4stamp=1404669125
Trying to get more info on failure.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unreleased
APT policy: (500,
5 matches
Mail list logo
