On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:57:16PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:30:53PM -0400, Fred Korz wrote:
> > [...] I did notice, on the shell from which I
> > invoked /usr/bin/gtkpod 716 consecutive instances of "(gtkpod:20613):
> > libanjuta-CRITICAL **: anjuta_status_progress_
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:30:53PM -0400, Fred Korz wrote:
> [...] I did notice, on the shell from which I
> invoked /usr/bin/gtkpod 716 consecutive instances of "(gtkpod:20613):
> libanjuta-CRITICAL **: anjuta_status_progress_increment_ticks: assertion
> 'status->priv->total_ticks != 0' failed".
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 29/07/14 05:05, Fred Korz wrote:
> > Package: libanjuta-3-0
> > Version: 2:3.8.4-3+b1
> > Severity: important
>
> Does it still happen with anjuta 3.12?
For me, with anjuta 3.12, I get the following:
polya:~ $ gtkpod
*
On 07/29/2014 03:27 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 29/07/14 05:05, Fred Korz wrote:
Package: libanjuta-3-0
Version: 2:3.8.4-3+b1
Severity: important
Does it still happen with anjuta 3.12?
Emilio
Emilio,
Thanks for swift reply. Sorry for the delay in execution.
Updated to libanjuta-3-
On 29/07/14 05:05, Fred Korz wrote:
> Package: libanjuta-3-0
> Version: 2:3.8.4-3+b1
> Severity: important
Does it still happen with anjuta 3.12?
Emilio
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situatio
Package: libanjuta-3-0
Version: 2:3.8.4-3+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Starting /usr/bin/gtkpod
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
inef
6 matches
Mail list logo
