On 08/02/2014 11:08 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
How about this change? Torben, could you test?
I choose to use your 'temporary file' solution. Seemed simplest.
I don't like it much. It is too much of unwanted work for something
which could have been done more simply in the first place.
On Aug 3, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I will soon, for the next upload, revert these changes, and move back to the
old solution of (mount -a + swapon -a). Is that okay with you guys ???
Not to me, not really! Your previous way didn't work at all for me, this works
for
On 08/03/2014 05:26 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
On Aug 3, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I will soon, for the next upload, revert these changes, and move back
to the old solution of (mount -a + swapon -a). Is that okay with you
guys ???
Not to me, not really! Your previous
For me it seems the older slightly extended short version is doing all tasks
including adding the swap devices. Just the explicit fsck would be missing, but
is it necessary anyways?
I would also give the short version including swapon a thumbs up!
On Aug 3, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Aug 3, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Why ?? It should work. Your previous bug report was about swap devices
not being handled. With its inclusion, why will it not work ?
1. Because there's no fsck before mounting the filesystem.
That's really ugly, and potentially
On 08/03/2014 07:40 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
1. Because there's no fsck before mounting the filesystem.
That's really ugly, and potentially dangerous. Yes, it will simply fail if
the fs
is dirty, but I'm sure there's occasions where mount doesn't discover
everything
and a
Package: open-iscsi
Version: 2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-2
Severity: important
Dear Ritesh and Turbo,
this new patch is causing trouble for two reasons. Here are the relevant lines
from patch 7e1ae42:
+ while read fs; do
+ set -- $(eval echo $fs | sed 's@:@ @')
+
Thank you for the bug report Torben.
Sigh!! I think that whole patch was buggy. I don't see the $fs variable
ever having been initialized. Was it ?? My bad. :-(
@Turbo: Do you have an opinion here? I am inclined to reverting that
patch completely. Let me know.
On 08/02/2014 06:23 PM, Torben
Hi Ritesh,
oh yes, the fs variable is initialized before the loops are starting, together
with the MOUNT_RESULT:
# Now let's mount
log_daemon_msg Mounting network filesystems
MOUNT_RESULT=1
fs=
And I guess functionality is good after removing the “break”
On Aug 2, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Torben Frey wrote:
And I guess functionality is good after removing the “break” command.
I just tested this with multiple _netdev entries, and they all work!
So I couldn't reproduce this problem.
I just don’t exactly know how the MOUNT_RESULT could summarize the
How about this change? Torben, could you test?
I choose to use your 'temporary file' solution. Seemed simplest.
open-iscsi.init.diff
Description: Binary data
Hey Turbo,
And I guess functionality is good after removing the “break” command.
I just tested this with multiple _netdev entries, and they all work!
So I couldn't reproduce this problem.
I have tried once more and with the break command it is always stopping after
the first mount, be it
Hey again, Turbo!
How about this change? Torben, could you test?
I choose to use your 'temporary file' solution. Seemed simplest.
I have patched the original init script with your new patch - and it is working
flawlessly for me.
When all my 4 fstab entries are correct and mountable, I am
On Aug 2, 2014, at 10:56 PM, Torben Frey wrote:
Working perfectly for me now.
Thanks for the quick fix and patch!
Sounds good and you're most welcome! Ritesh, mind applying it to the next
package
version?
Btw, you can close https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688209,
because
Hey Turbo,
I have tried once more and with the break command it is always stopping
after the first mount, be it successful or not. Removing the break is
mounting all 4 devices in my stab.
Weird! May I ask what your fstab entries look like (exactly)?
Thanks a lot, I will send the other
15 matches
Mail list logo
